期刊文献+

碳限额与交易机制下供应商-制造商生产决策研究

Production Decision of the Supplier-manufacturer under the Carbon Cap-and-trade Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考虑由供应商和制造商构成的两级供应链系统,研究碳限额与交易机制下供应商领导的供应链生产决策问题.在碳限额与交易机制下,运用Stackelberg博弈理论,以供应商为领导者,分别给出在分散决策和集中决策时各自以自身收益最大化为目标的最优生产决策,得出供应商和制造商同时达到生产决策的临界点.通过无碳排放约束和碳限额与交易机制的比较,说明碳限额与交易机制能够在一定范围内起到减少碳排放的作用,并通过算例验证了结论的正确性. Considering a two-stage supply chain system constituted by the suppliers and manufacturers, this paper studies the supply chain production decision problem dominated by the suppliers under the carbon cap-and-trade mechanism. In this situation, under the leadership of the suppliers, Stackelberg game theory is used to give optimal production decisions for maximizing their own profit respectively while making the decentralized decision and centralized decision.A conclusion is made that suppliers and manufactures would reach the critical point of production decisions at the same time. By comparing the non-carbon constraints and the cap-and-trade mechanism,the paper proves that the carbon cap-and-trade mec verl hanism can reduce the carbon emission in a certain range. Finally,a numerical example is given to fy the correctness of the conclusion.
出处 《安徽工程大学学报》 CAS 2016年第4期88-94,F0003,共8页 Journal of Anhui Polytechnic University
基金 安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(1308085MG108)
关键词 生产决策 供应链 碳限额与交易机制 STACKELBERG博弈 production decision supply chain carbon cap-and-trade mechanism stackelberg game
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1杜少甫,董骏峰,梁樑,张靖江.考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):81-86. 被引量:143
  • 2苗圩.我国重返全球制造业第一大国[EB/OL].http://www.shantui.com/news/4316_for_xingyexinwen_text.htm,2012-09-18.
  • 3王锋,吴丽华,杨超.中国经济发展中碳排放增长的驱动因素研究[J].经济研究,2010,45(2):123-136. 被引量:548
  • 4中国能源和碳排放研究课题组.2050中国能源和碳排放报告[R].科学出版社,2009.
  • 5P Letmathe,N Balakrishnan.Environmental Considerations on the Optimal Product Mix[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2005,167:398-412.
  • 6G Hua,S Cheng.Managing Carbon Footprints in Inventory Management[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2011,132:178-185.
  • 7J Zhang,T Nie,S Du.Optimal Emission-dependent Production Policy with Stochastic Demand[J].Int.J of Society Systems Science,2010,3(1/2):21-39.
  • 8蓝海燕,戢守峰.限额与交易机制下厂商订货策略[J].系统工程,2013,31(12):81-86. 被引量:12
  • 9马常松,陈旭,罗振宇,李天.随机需求下考虑低碳政策规制的企业生产策略[J].控制与决策,2015,30(6):969-976. 被引量:8
  • 10S Benjaafar,Y Li,M Daskin.Carbon Footprint and the Management of Supply Chains:Insights from Simple Models[J].Auto-mation Science and Engineering,2013,10(1):99-116.

二级参考文献94

  • 1刘小玄.民营化改制对中国产业效率的效果分析——2001年全国普查工业数据的分析[J].经济研究,2004,39(8):16-26. 被引量:208
  • 2王迎军.顾客需求驱动的供应链契约问题综述[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(2):68-76. 被引量:60
  • 3徐国泉,刘则渊,姜照华.中国碳排放的因素分解模型及实证分析:1995-2004[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2006,16(6):158-161. 被引量:1050
  • 4Oberthur S. , Ott, H. E.. The Kyoto Protocol:International Climate Policy for the 21st Century [M]. Berlin/ Heidelberg/New York, Springer, 1999.
  • 5香港环境保护署.2008空气污染管理(修订)条例草案[Z].香港,2008,http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr07-08/chinese/bills/brief/b26_brf.pdf.
  • 6魏一鸣,等.中国能源报告(2008):碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:134.
  • 7Monica, B. , Frabcesco, G.. Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading": A dominant firm with competitive fringe model [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8) : 4200-4220.
  • 8Kara, M. , et al. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2) : 193-211.
  • 9Tsikalakis, A.G., Hatziargyriou, N.D.. Environmental benefits of distributed generation with and without emissions trading [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(6): 3395-3409.
  • 10Damien, D. , Philippe, Q.. European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 30 (4) : 2009-2027.

共引文献787

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部