期刊文献+

墨尔本“棕地”再开发的监管体系与制度设计 被引量:2

Regulatory System and Institutional Design for Brownfield Redevelopment in Melbourne
原文传递
导出
摘要 经过30多年高速城市化,如何合理使用"存量资源"、再开发棕地成为我国城市下阶段必须面对的挑战。基于西方国家现有经验和教训,我们不能在房地产开发的压力下,对棕地潜在的环境危害视而不见;但在人多地少的基本国情下,同样不能因噎废食,弃之不用。为此,亟需建立一套系统、科学的监管体系,推动安全、有序、高效的棕地再开发。基于对文献和实践的梳理,本文以墨尔本为研究案例,收集其市区大型棕地开发项目,对其监管体系和所涉及的利益相关者进行制度分析,以期为我国建立棕地监管体系提供借鉴。研究表明,对建设开发过程进行制度化监管是确保和推动墨尔本棕地再开发的关键,而在对棕地进行详细分类与前置审批的过程中,规划机构应起到核心作用。虽有国情差异,国际棕地再开发监管体系与制度设计对我国城市颇具借鉴意义。 After 30 years' urban growth the scarcity of China's urban land resource has gradually become apparent. One of the main challenges that Chinese cities face is the effective reuse of urban brownfield sites. The history of industrial nations, suggests the impossibility of ignoring the social cost of urban brownfields, yet this needs not prevent their responsible reuse. The key is to build an effective regulatory system to guide brownfield redevelopment. This study identifies major brownfield residential projects located in the inner-Melbourne area. It identifies regulation framework, linkage and actors, aiming to assist institutional design to guide brownfield redevelopment in Chinese cities. Research findings show that a properly designed effective regulation system is the key to balance brownfield reuse in Melbourne. Planning agency plays a key role in brownfield redevelopment.
出处 《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期72-78,共7页 Urban Planning International
关键词 棕地 监管体系 利益相关者 墨尔本 Brownfield Regulatory System Stake-holder Melbourne
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1de Sousa,Turning C A.Brownfields into Green Space in the City of Toronto[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,62:181-198.
  • 2Alker S,Joy V,Roberts P,Smith N.The Definition of Brownfield[J].Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2000,43:49-69.
  • 3Ganser R,Williams K.Brownfield Development:Are We Using the Right Targets?Evidence from England and Germany[J].European Planning Studies,2007,15:603-622.
  • 4Dixon T.Integrating Sustainability into Brownfield Regeneration:Rhetoric or Reality[J].Journal of Property Research,2006,23:237-67.
  • 5Adams D,Watkins C.Greenfields,Brownfields and Housing Development[M].Oxford,England:Blackwell Science,2002.
  • 6Xie J,Li F.Overview of the Current Situation on Brownfield Remediation and Development in China[R].The World Bank,September 2010.
  • 7Wu H,Chen C.A Pilot Case Study of Brownfield High-density Housing Development in China[J].International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis,2010,3:119-131.
  • 8Wu H,Chen C.A Pilot Case Study of Inner-city High-density Housing on Brownfield in Chongqing,China[C].The 16th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference 24-27 January 2010.
  • 9Blum E D.Love Canal Revisited:Race,Class,and Gender in Environmental Activism[M].Kansas:University Press of Kansas,2008.
  • 10Day Jared N,Lisa Johnson.Clean Sites and Toxic Burdens:The Evolution and Legacy of New Jersey’s Mandatory Toxic Waste Cleanup Program,1976-1993[J].The Journal of Policy History,2004,16(3):239-267.

二级参考文献15

  • 1傅宇凡.城市化与毒地困境我国毒地面积相当于12个北京.
  • 2Steinzor R. Superfnnd for Urban Land-use Planners[J].The Urban lawyer,1993,(02):407-452.
  • 3Probst K N. Footing the Bill for Superfund Cleanups:Who Pays and How[M].Washington,D.C.:Brookings Institution:Resources for the Future,1995.
  • 4Wernstedt K,Hersh R. Urban Land Use and Superfund Cleanups[J].JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS,1998,(04):459-474.
  • 5US Environmental Protection Agency. Industri-Plex Finance Case Study[EB/OL].http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle_old/success/financs/induplex.htm,2006.
  • 6US Environmental Protection Agency. Reusing Superfund Sites[R].Washington,D.C.:Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,2006.
  • 7Katsumata P T,Kastenberg W E. On the Impact of Future Land Use Assumptions on Risk Analysis for Superfund Sites[J].Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association,1997,(08):881-889.
  • 8Poggio L,Vrscaj B,Hepperle E. Introducing a Method of Human Health Risk Evaluation for Planning and Soil Quality Management of Heavy Metal-polluted Soils--An Example from Grugliasco (Italy)[J].Landscape and Urban planning,2008,(2-4):64-72.
  • 9US Environmental Protection Agency. Land Use in the CERCLA Remedy Selection Process[EB/OL].http://www.epa.gov/superfund/community/relocation/landuse.pdf,1995.
  • 10US Environmental Protection Agency. Considering Reasonably Anticipated Future Land Use and Reducing Barriers to Reuse at EPA-lead Superfund Remedial Sites[EB/OL].http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/recycle/pdf/reusedirective.pdf,2010.

共引文献37

同被引文献42

引证文献2

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部