期刊文献+

Perception and Uses of Stakeholders' Power on Health and Safety Risk Management in Construction Projects in Tanzania

Perception and Uses of Stakeholders' Power on Health and Safety Risk Management in Construction Projects in Tanzania
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Key project stakeholders such as clients, consultant teams, contractors and workers have different sources of power to implement projects. How these powers influence health and safety risk management is not well documented. This article therefore assesses the perception and uses of stakeholders' power on health and safety in risk management in construction projects in Tanzania, specifically focuses on sources and types of power, how stakeholders perceive their power, how they use power on health and safety risk management, and what factors hinders their use of power. A case study strategy was adopted and four large on-going construction projects in Dar es Salaam Tanzania were involved. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with clients, consultants, contractors and construction workers. Findings indicate that stakeholders have different sources of power such as technical expertise, legitimate, political position, resources information to influence health and safety risk management. Nonetheless, the use of these powers was generally limited due to low level of knowledge on health and safety risk management among stakeholders, wrong perception on their roles, insufficient health and safety regulations and weak procurement system. The research recommends that, in order to realize health and safety performance through using stakeholder's power, there is a need of clear definition of stakeholders' role and responsibilities on health and safety, wide knowledge and experiences on health and safety risk management, strong regulatory system and procurement system.
出处 《Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture》 2016年第8期955-963,共9页 土木工程与建筑(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Jasperson, J. S., Carte, T. A., Saunders, C. S., Butler, B. S., Croes, H. J. P., and Zheng, W. 2002. "Review: Power and Information Technology Research: A Meta triangulation Review." MIS Quarterly 26 (4): 397-459.
  • 2Etzioni, A. 1978. "Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations." In Organizational Behavior and the Practice of Management, edited by Hampton, D., Summer, C., and Weber, R. Glenview, IL.: Scott Foresman & Co.
  • 3Folger, J., Poole, M., and Stutman, R. 1993. Working through Conflict. New York: Harper Collins.
  • 4Arnstein, S. 1969. "A Ladder of Citizen Participation." American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216-24.
  • 5Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic Management." A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing.
  • 6Lingard, H., and Rowlinson, S. M. 2005. Occupational Health and Safety in Construction Project Management.London: Taylor & Francis.
  • 7French, J. R. P., and Raven, B. 1959. "The Bases of Social Power." In Studies in Social Power, edited by Cartwright, D. Michigan: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
  • 8Carson, P. P., Carson, K. D., and Roe, C. W. 1993. "Social Power Bases: A Meta-analytic Examination on Interrelationships and Outcomes." Applied Social Psychology 23 (14): 1150-69.
  • 9Finkelstein, S. 1992. "Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation." Academy of Management 35: 505-38.
  • 10Lunenburg, F. 2012. "Power and Leadership: An Influence Process." Management, Business, and Administration 15 (1) : 1-9.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部