期刊文献+

行业竞争是外部治理机制还是外部诱导因素——基于中国上市公司盈余管理的经验证据 被引量:45

Industry Competition Is External Governance Mechanism or External Incentives? Based on Empirical Evidence of Chinese Listed Companies' Earnings Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以2007-2013年我国沪深两市A股上市公司为研究样本,从行业竞争视角考察了行业竞争激烈程度、公司竞争能力以及产权性质对上市公司盈余管理的影响。研究发现:(1)当行业竞争程度较低时,行业竞争与上市公司盈余管理呈负相关关系,即行业竞争体现出外部治理机制;(2)当行业竞争程度较高时,行业竞争与上市公司盈余管理呈正相关关系,即行业竞争体现出外部诱导作用;(3)在特定的行业内,当公司处于竞争劣势时,随着行业竞争的加剧,公司会进行更多的盈余管理;(4)考虑产权性质的影响,当国有企业处于竞争劣势时,随着行业竞争的加剧,处于竞争劣势的国有企业相对于竞争优势的国有企业会使用较多的应计盈余管理和真实盈余管理,而该差异在非国有企业中却不显著。上述结论可为投资者、政府等监管部门制定对策提供参考依据,有助于实现我国经济转轨的健康有序进行。 In general, studies on the relationship between industry competition and earnings management still cannot reach a consensus. Correspondingly, our research drawing on the data from 2007 to 2013 for companies listed in the Chinese A-type share market, we focus on the impact of the intensity of industry competition on earnings management, incorporating company competitiveness and the nature of ownership as independent variables. Empirical evidence reveals the following. (1) When competition is relatively low, industry competition can significantly restrain the extent of earnings management; that is, industry competition reflects an external governance mechanism. (2) When competition is relatively high, industry competition significantly promotes the extent of earnings management; that is, industry competition reflects external incentives. (3) Within a certain industry, the higher the industry competition is, the more companies manipulate earnings when under a competitive inferior position. (4) Considering the type of ownership, as the intensity of industry competition increases, SOEs at a disadvantage use more accrual- based earnings management and real earnings management strategies, which is insignificant for non-SOEs. (5) In the further study, we found that there may be non-linear relationship between industry competition and earnings management, which may be an important reason for the previous scholars' research results is not uniform on the study on the relationship between industry competition and earnings management. This paper extends research on the relationship between industry competition and earnings management and provides a new perspective to understanding the relationship between industry competition and earnings management. The results of this study prove significant for the government, the relevant regulatory authorities, and investors. First, on account of inducing more earnings, the government should play more attention to excessively competitive industries. Inappropriate earnings management reduces the transparency of capital markets and misguides investors, which is not conducive to the healthy development of the capital market. Second, stemming from the characteristics of SOEs such as owner absence and a dominate share, the government should focus on SOEs with competitive disadvantage to prevent executives from using their political connections to manipulate earnings, damaging the profits for investors. Finally, we interpret companies' earnings management from a new perspective and offer investors the gist that they need to make their own decisions.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期75-86,共12页 Nankai Business Review
基金 辽宁省社科规划基金重点项目(L15AGL018) 中央高校基本科研业务经费人文社科科研专题(DUT15RW506)资助
关键词 行业竞争 公司竞争能力 产权性质 盈余管理 Industry Competition Company Competitiveness Ownership Earnings Management
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1Akdogu, E., Mackay, P. Product Markets and Corporate Investment: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2012, 36(2): 439-453.
  • 2Datta, S., Iskandar-Datta, M., Sharma, V. Product Market Pricing Power, Industry Concentration and Analysts' Earnings Forecasts. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2011, 35(6): 1352-1366.
  • 3Haushalter, D., Klasa, S., Maxwell, W. The Influence of Product Market Dynamics on the Firm's Cash Holdings and Hedging Behavior. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2005, 84(3): 797-825.
  • 4Grullon, G., Michaely, R. Corporate Payout Policy and Product Market Competition. Social Science Electronic Publishing, http://www.ou.edu/dam/price/Finance/CFS/paper/pdf/PMC_ DIV.pdf, 2007-3-15.
  • 5Fama, E. F. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, 88(2): 288-307.
  • 6Hart, O. The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme. Journal of Economics, 1983, (14): 366-382.
  • 7Stivers, A. E. Unraveling of Information: Competition and Uncertainty. Journal of Theoretical Economics 2004, (4): 1-30.
  • 8Harris, M. S. The Association between Competition and Managers' Business Segment Reporting Decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 1998, (36): 111-128.
  • 9Hayes, R., Lundholm, R. Segment Reporting to the Capital Market in the Presence of a Competitor. Journal of Accounting Research, 1996, (34): 261-279.
  • 10Gertner, R., Gibbons, R., Scharfstein, D. Simultaneous Signaling to the Capital and Product Markets. Journal of Economics, 1988, (19): 173-190.

共引文献2453

同被引文献686

引证文献45

二级引证文献367

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部