群体心理资本对员工创造力的跨层次影响被引量：14

A Cross-Level Examination of Collective Psychological Capital and Employee Creativity

下载PDF

导出

摘要员工创造力是团队/组织创新的重要推动力,从多个层次综合考察员工创造力的影响因素具有重要意义。基于创造力成分模型、社会感染理论与组织管理领域的多层次理论,构建了群体心理资本影响员工创造力的关系模型,以103个工作团队(103名团队主管,365名成员)为样本,对研究假设及影响路径进行了实证检验。研究结果表明:1群体心理资本对员工创造力具有显著的正向预测效果;2群体心理资本对团队反思具有显著的正向预测效果,且团队反思在群体心理资本与员工创造力关系间起到了跨层次中介作用;3团队心理安全跨层次调节团队反思与员工创造力之间的正向关系,即团队心理安全越高,团队反思与员工创造力之间的正向关系越强。 Research on employee creativity form multilevel is increasingly becoming the focus of academia,especially for its important for team/organizational innovation.Based on creativity component model,social contagion and multilevel theory,this study aims to investigate the mechanism that collective psychological capital influence on employee creativity,using data gathered through a survey of 103 valid samples for research;we empirically test all the hypotheses.The results show that：1collective psychological capital had a significant positive influence on employee creativity;2Collective psychological capital had a significant positive influence on team reflexivity,and team reflexivity mediated the relationship between collective psychological capital and employee creativity;3Team psychological safety significantly moderated the relationships between team reflexivity and employee creativity such that the higher of the team psychological safety,the stronger of team reflexivity and employee creativity.

作者徐振亭罗瑾琏孙秀明

机构地区同济大学经济与管理学院青岛理工大学商学院

出处《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第15期139-144,共6页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71472137 71302048) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大科技攻关项目(10JZD0045-2)

关键词群体心理资本员工创造力团队反思团队心理安全 Collective Psychological Capital Employee Creativity Team Reflexivity Team Psychological Safety

分类号 F272.92 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1HON A H Y. Shaping environments conductive to creativity the role of intrinsic motivation [J]. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 2012, 53(1): 53-64.
2HON A H Y, LU L. Are we paid to be creative? the effect of compensation gap on creativity in an expatriate context [J].Journal of World Business, 2015, 50(1): 159-167.
3ANDERSON N, POTOCNIK K, ZHOU J. Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, pro- spective commentary, and guiding framework [J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(5) : 1297-1333.
4HON A H Y, CHAN W W H, LU L. Overcoming work-re- lated stress and promoting employee ereativity in hotel in- dustry: the role of task feedback from supervisor[J]. Inter- national Journal of Hospitality Management, 2013, 33 416-424.
5KIM T Y, HON A H Y, LEE D R. Proactive personality and employee creativity: the effects of job creativity require- ment and supervisor support for creativity [J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2010, 22(1) : 37-45.
6WALUMBWA F O, LUTHANS F, AVEY J B, et al. Re- tracted: authentically leading groups: the mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust[J]. Journal of Or- ganizational Behavior, 2011, 32(1) : 4-24.
7AVEY J B, REICHARD R J, LUTHANS F, et al. Meta - analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance[J]. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9011, 22(2) : 127-152.
8DEGOEY P. Contagious justice: exploring the social con- struction of justice in organizations[J]. Research in Organi- zational Behavior, 2000, 22: 51-102.
9曹科岩.团队心理安全感对成员创新行为影响的跨层次研究:知识分享的中介作用[J].心理科学,2015,38(4):966-972. 被引量：18
10FARAJ S, YAN A. Boundary work in knowledge teams [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(3): 604.

二级参考文献33

1黄致凯.(2004).组织创新气候知觉,个人创新行为,自我效能知觉与问题锯决型态关系之硬究-以银行业为研究对象.台湾中山大学硕士学位论文.
2温福星.(2009).阶甚线性模型的原理与应用.北京:中国轻工业出版社.
3Bogenrieder, I., & Nooteboom, B. (2004). Learning groups: What types are there? A theoretical analysis and an empirical study in a constdtancy finn. Organiza6on Studies, 25(2), 287-313.
4Carmeli, A., Brueller, D. , & Dutton, J. E. (2009). Learning behaviors in the workplace: The role of high-quality interpersonal relationships and psychological safety. System Research and Behavioral Science, 26(1), 81-98.
5De, Jong. J., & Den, Hartog. D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
6Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
7Faraj, S., &Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams.Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 604-617.
8Holub, S. F. (2003). Knowledge sharing is a change-management exercise. Tax Practice Management, 34(6), 361-363.
9Hooff, B. V. , & Weenen, F. L. (2004). Committed to share: Commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 11(1), 13-24.
10Hulsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work : A meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145.