期刊文献+

助力科研的资源利用与服务探索——基于WoS与Google Scholar的比较研究 被引量:2

Assist Scientific Research via Resource Utilization and Service——A Comparative Study Based on WoS and Google Scholar
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从深度利用数据资源和助力科研的角度,对比分析Web of Science和Google Scholar在化学领域中的性能差异。通过对比分析,从检索性能、分析性能、覆盖能力、引文跟踪、定题跟踪等方面进行比较和案例分析。发现Web of Science在化学领域具有权威性、稳定性、功能性等优势,其专业性能尚未充分利用。指出图书馆深入挖掘数据资源实用价值,提出从检索到发现的服务思路,推动技能服务和分析服务的双向服务模式。 From the perspective of depth using the data resources and power of scientific research,analysis of the Web of Science and Google Scholar performance in the field of chemistry. Taking comparison and case analysis,from the retrieval performance,this paper analyzed performance,coverage,citation tracking,topic tracking,etc. Web of Science has the authority,stability,functional advantages,but its performance had yet to make full use of. Library needed to dig deeper into the data resources and practical value,this paper proposed the search to discovery service idea,and promoted two- way service mode on skills and analysis.
作者 闫智 韩爽
机构地区 吉林大学图书馆
出处 《现代情报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期103-108,共6页 Journal of Modern Information
关键词 Web of SCIENCE GOOGLE SCHOLAR 文献检索 引文分析 学术检索平台分析 Web of Science Google Scholar literature retrieval citation analysis academic analysis retrieval platform
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Waiters, W.H.. Comparative recall and precision of simple and expert searches in Google Scholar and eight other databases [ J]. Libraries and the Academy, 2001, 11 (4): 972-1006.
  • 2Audrey Baneyx. "Publish or Perish" as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in eco- nomics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history [J].Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp., 2008, (56): 363-371.
  • 3Lutz Bommann, Werner Marx, Hennann Schier, Erhard Rahm, An- dreas Thor, Hans - Dieter Daniel. Convergent validity of bibliometrie Google Scholar data in the field of chemistlt-Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or re- jected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2009, (3): 27-35.
  • 4Anne - Wil Harzing. A longitudinal study of Google Scholar coverage between2012 and2013 [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, (98): 565- 575.
  • 5Simona stirbu, Paul Thirion, Serge Schmitz, Gentiane Haesbroeck, Ninfa Greeo. The Utility of Google Scholar When Searching Geographi- cal Literature: ComparisonWith Three Cornmereial Bibliographic Databases [J]. The Journal of Academic Librarimlship, 2015, (41) : 322 - 329.
  • 6耿海英,肖仙桃.Web of Science和Google Scholar引文检索功能比较[J].图书与情报,2007(3):100-102. 被引量:17
  • 7陶慧卿,潘卫,庄琦.从引文分析的角度比较Google Scholar与Web of Science的优势与不足[J].图书馆杂志,2008,27(12):29-35. 被引量:16
  • 8任静,孙建军.Web of Science与Google Scholar的引文分析比较研究[J].情报科学,2011,29(11):1688-1692. 被引量:9
  • 9袁顺波,庞冬妮.国际知名检索工具引文功能的比较分析-以webofScience、Scopus与GoogleScholar为例[A].见:2013年第三届全国情报学博士生学术论坛论文集[C].2013.
  • 10张晓林.研究图书馆2020:嵌入式协作化知识实验室?[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(1):11-20. 被引量:202

二级参考文献54

共引文献236

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部