人工镜检与AVE764全自动尿沉渣分析仪检验结果的对比分析

Comparison of Test Results between Artificial Microscopic Examination and AVE-764 Full-automated Urinary Sediment Analyzer

目的对人工镜检与AVE764全自动尿沉渣分析仪检验结果进行对比分析。方法选取进行尿液分析患者1000例,均给予人工镜检和AVE764全自动尿沉渣分析仪进行检验分析。结果人工镜检和AVE764全自动尿沉渣分析检验结果存在显著差异性(P<0.05)。结论对于尿液分析应用AVE764全自动尿沉渣分析仪进行检验结果同人工镜检存在差异性,但AVE764全自动尿沉渣分析仪还不能完全代替人工镜检,需要联合两种方法进行尿液分析,获得准确的检查结果,为临床诊断提供可靠的依据。

Objective The compare and analyze the test results of artificial microscopic examination and AVE-764 full-automated urinary sediment analyzer. Methods 1000 patients that underwent urinalysis were selected and examined by artificial microscopy and AVE-764 full-automated urinary sediment analyzer. Results There was a significant difference of test results between artificial microscopic examination and AVE-764 full-automated urinary sediment analyzer（P〈0.05）. Conclusion There is a difference of test results between artificial microscopic examination and AVE-764 full-automated urinary sediment analyzer in urinalysis, but AVE-764 analyzer cannot completely replace manual microscopic examination; we need to combine the two methods to obtain accurate test results and provide a reliable base for diagnosis.