期刊文献+

不同放牧强度下短花针茅荒漠草原植被.土壤系统有机碳组分储量特征 被引量:14

Organic carbon storage properties in Stipa breviflora desert steppe vegetation soil systems under different grazing intensities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 草地生态系统作为陆地生态系统的重要组成部分,在全球碳循环中发挥着重要作用。以内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原不同放牧强度样地为研究对象,通过分析地上植物、凋落物、根系、土壤中有机碳和土壤轻组有机碳,研究草原植被-土壤系统有机碳组分储量的变化特征,从碳储量角度为合理利用草原提供指导。研究结果表明:(1)不同放牧强度荒漠草原地上植物碳储量为11.98—44.51 g/m^2,凋落物碳储量10.43—36.12 g/m^2,根系(0—40cm)碳储量502.30—804.31 g/m^2,且对照区(CK)均显著高于中度放牧区(MG)、重度放牧区(HG);(2)0—40cm土壤碳储量为7817.43—9694.16 g/m^2,其中轻度放牧区(LG)碳储量为9694.16 g/m^2,显著高于CK、HG(P<0.05);(3)植被—土壤系统的碳储量为8342.14—10494.80 g/m^2,LG>MG>CK>HG,有机碳主要储存于土壤当中,占比约90.54%—93.71%,适度放牧利用有利于发挥草地生态系统的碳汇功能;(4)土壤轻组有机碳储量为484.20—654.62 g/m^2,LG储量最高,表明适度放牧有助于草原土壤营养物质的循环和积累。 Grassland ecosystem, an important component of terrestrial ecosystem, plays an essential role in global carbon cycle and balance. The Stipa breviflora desert steppe of Inner Mongolia is a transitional ecosystem from grassland to desert, which ha~ infertile soil, weak stability, but high sensitivity to climate and environmental changes. Study on organic carbon storage of the steppe under different grazing intensities is very important for revealing the mechanism of grazing impact on carbon process of the desert steppe and can provide theoretical basis for reasonable conservation and utilization of grassland resources. According to the grassland plant species composition, community height, coverage, aboveground biomass, and density index, the steppe was divided into plots that were subjected to three grazing intensities, heavy grazing moderate grazing (MG), and light grazing (LG), and the experimental grassland which was fenced to exclude ( HG), livestockgrazing in 2008 was selected as the control sample (CK). The analyses of the aboveground biomass, litter, belowground biomass, soil organic carbon, and soil light fraction organic carbon were utilized to study the organic carbon storage properties in Stipa breviflora desert steppe vegetation soil systems under different grazing intensities. The results showed the following. The carbon storage was 11.98-44.51 g/m2 in aboveground biomass, 10.43-36.12 g/m2 in litter, and 502.30- 804.31 g/m2 in belowground biomass (0-40 cm); it was significantly higher in CK than in MG and HG. The carbon storage in the soil at a depth of 0-40 cm was 7817.43-9694.16 g/m2, and it was significantly higher in LG than in CK and HG. The total carbon storage in the vegetation-soil system was 8342.14-10494.80 g/m2 under different grazing intensities; it was the largest in LG, followed by MG, CK, and HG. About 90.54%-93.71% of the total carbon was reserved in soil. Light and moderate grazing intensities increased organic carbon level of the ecosystem due to the increase in the root:shoot ratio. The grazing intensities of plant root:shoot ratios decreased from HD (41.94) to MD (30.24), LD (24.33) , and CK (18.07) , thereby increasing the allocation of carbon amount into the ground. Increased organic carbon content in the ecosystem may also be due to animals trampling and breaking the litter and thus promoting litter decomposition and carbon and nutrients release into the soil. However, heavy grazing severely reduced the grassland vegetation leaf area and storage material, decreased plant net primary production, lowered material input to levels below the output, and decreased the ecosystem carbon storage. Each component of the system accounted for the percentage of ecosystem organic carbon storage in the following order: soil 〉 root 〉 aboveground vegetation 〉 litter in different grazing intensities. Organic carbon storage accumulation in the vegetation had a short-term effect, while its accumulation in the soil was relatively slow. With increasing grazing intensity, aboveground vegetation, litter, and root organic carbon storage showed a decreasing trend, while soil organic carbon storage first increased and then decreased; MG was beneficial to the accumulation of soil organic carbon storage. The soil light fraction organic carbon storage was 484.20-654.62 g/m2, and it was the highest in LG. With increasing grazing intensity, the soil light fraction organic carbon content, storage, and percentage of soil organic carbon storage first increased and then decreased, reaching the highest value in LG. MG intensity was beneficial to soil nutrient accumulation in the desert steppe.
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第15期4617-4625,共9页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41301302) 教育部科技创新团队项目(IRT1259)
关键词 荒漠草原 放牧强度 碳储量 土壤轻组有机碳 desert steppe grazing intensity carbon storage soil light fraction organic carbon
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Ojima D S, DirkB O M, Gleovn E P, Owensby C E, Scurlock J O. Assessment of C budget for grasslands and drylands of the world. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1993, 70(1/4) : 95-109.
  • 2张金霞,曹广民,周党卫,赵新全.放牧强度对高寒灌丛草甸土壤CO_2释放速率的影响[J].草地学报,2001,9(3):183-190. 被引量:30
  • 3Raich J W, Schlesinger W H. The global carbon dioxide fluxin soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B, 1992, 44 (2) : 81-99.
  • 4Lal R, Fausey N R, Eckert D J. Land use and soil management effects on emissions of radiatively active gases from two soils in Ohio// Lal R, Kimble J, Levine E, Stewart B A, eds. Soil Management and Greenhouse Effect. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1995. 41-59.
  • 5Percival H J, Parfitt R L, Scott N A. Factors controlling soil carbon levels in New Zealand grassland: Is clay content important? Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000, 64(5) : 1623-1630.
  • 6Eldridge D J, Val J, James A I. Abiotic effects predominate under prolonged livestock induced disturbance. Austral Ecology, 2011, 36 (4): 367- 377.
  • 7闫瑞瑞,辛晓平,王旭,闫玉春,邓钰,杨桂霞.不同放牧梯度下呼伦贝尔草甸草原土壤碳氮变化及固碳效应[J].生态学报,2014,34(6):1587-1595. 被引量:47
  • 8陈芙蓉,程积民,刘伟,李媛,陈奥,赵新宇.不同干扰对黄土高原典型草原土壤有机碳的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(2):298-304. 被引量:31
  • 9李春莉,赵萌莉,韩国栋,红梅.不同放牧压力下荒漠草原土壤有机碳特征及其与植被之间关系的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(5):134-138. 被引量:42
  • 10Han G D, Hao X Y, Zhao M L, Wang M J, E11ert B H, Willms W, Wang M J. Effect of grazing intensity on carbon and nitrogen in soil and vegetation in a meadow steppe in Inner Mongolia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2008, 125 (1/4) : 21-32.

二级参考文献483

共引文献1382

同被引文献337

引证文献14

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部