期刊文献+

结肠癌患者行腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗的疗效比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Laparoscopic Surgery and Traditional Open Surgery in Pa-tients with Colon Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究结肠癌患者行腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗的疗效。方法整群选取2014年3月—2015年3月该院收治的78例结肠癌患者按照奇偶数字法分为对照组(39例)与实验组(39例)。对照组采取传统开腹手术,实验组实施腹腔镜手术。评估两组疗效。结果与对照组相比,实验组术中出血量更少,术后排气时间更早,镇痛时间与住院时间更短,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组患者的并发症发生率5.1%,显著低于对照组的20.5%(P<0.05)。两组手术用时、淋巴结清除数、1年生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌效果确切,可减少术中创伤以及术后并发症。 Objective To study the curative effect of laparoscopic operation and traditional open surgery in patients with colon cancer. Methods Group selection 78 cases of colon cancer patients from March 2014 to march 2015 were divided into control group (39 cases) and experimental group (39 cases) according to the odd and even number method .Control group re-ceived conventional open surgery, experimental group received laparoscopic surgery. The treatment effect was observed. Results Compared with the control group, the experimental group were less blood loss, postoperative exhaust time earlier, the analgesia time and hospitalization time is shorter, the difference between the two groups with statistical significance (P〈0.05); the patients in the experimental group complication rate of 5.1%, significantly lower than the control group of 20.5%(P〈 0.05). In the two groups, the difference was not statistically significant (P〉 0.05), and the difference was not statisti-cally significant between the groups, the number of lymph nodes and the 1 year survival rate.Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is effective in the treatment of colon cancer, which can reduce the trauma and postoperative complications.
作者 王宇
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第19期46-47,67,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 结肠癌 开腹手术 腹腔镜 疗效 Colon cancer Open surgery Laparoscopy Curative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献79

  • 1牟一平,杨鹏,严加费,陈其龙,袁晓明,朱玲华,徐晓武.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床疗效评估[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(9):581-583. 被引量:83
  • 2曹其彬,胡三元.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌手术对机体免疫功能的比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2006,15(8):615-618. 被引量:53
  • 3汪路,孟庆勇,王小军,郑榜祥.结肠癌根治术后复发转移危险因素分析[J].中国肿瘤,2007,16(8):646-648. 被引量:21
  • 4郑民华,马君俊.腹腔镜外科在争议中发展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(5):503-505. 被引量:51
  • 5中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术指南(2006 版) [J]. 外科理论与实践, 2006,5(11):462-464.
  • 6Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol, 2005,6:477-684.
  • 7Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial) : multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2005, 365 : 1718-1726.
  • 8Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, ct al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg, 2002, 236: 759-766.
  • 9Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy- assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non- metastatic colon cancer : a randomised trial. Lancet, 2002, 359 : 2224 -2229.
  • 10Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 : 3061-3068.

共引文献181

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部