期刊文献+

替吉奥胶囊联合紫杉醇治疗术后复发或转移性胃癌的疗效分析 被引量:3

To Observe the Curative Effect of S-1 Combined Paclitaxel in the Treat-ment of Postoperative Recurrence or Metastasis of Gastric Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究在术后复发或转移性胃癌治疗中采用替吉奥胶囊与紫杉醇联合治疗的临床治疗效果。方法方便选取该院在2011年10月—2015年10月期间收治的复发或转移性胃癌患者30例作为研究对象,所有患者均给予替吉奥胶囊与紫杉醇联合治疗,对其治疗总有效率进行观察和分析。结果经过联合治疗,患者完全缓解率为10.00%;部分缓解率为43.33%;稳定率为23.33%,病情进展率为23.33%,治疗总有效率为53.33%,不良反应包括胃肠道反应、周围神经毒性、骨髓抑制。结论在复发或转移性胃癌治疗中给予替吉奥胶囊与紫杉醇联合治疗效果较为理想,不良反应较轻,具有耐受性,此治疗方案值得应用推广。 Objective To explore in the postoperative recurrence or metastasis of gastric cancer treatment with S-1 capsule combined with paclitaxel in the treatment of clinical therapeutic effect. Methods Convenient selection selected in our hospi-tal in 2011-2015 admitted during the period of recurrence or metastasis of gastric cancer patients with 30 cases as the ob-ject of study, all patients were treated with S-1 capsule combined with paclitaxel treatment, and the treatment effect was observed and analyzed. Results After the combined treatment, patients with complete remission rate was 10.00%, partial re-mission rate of 43.33%; stable rate was 23.33% and disease progression rate was 23.33%, the total efficiency of the treat-ment was 53.33%, the adverse effects including gastrointestinal tract reaction, peripheral nerve toxicity, bone marrow sup-pression. Conclusion In recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer treatment given S-1 and paclitaxel combined with ideal treatment effect and adverse reaction of lighter, with tolerance, this treatment is worth popularization and application.
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第19期110-111,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 替吉奥胶囊 紫杉醇 复发或转移性胃癌 Gimeracil capsule Paclitaxel Recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献71

  • 1秦叔逵,龚新雷.晚期胃癌化疗的现状和新进展[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(9):641-652. 被引量:269
  • 2孙燕,石远凯.临床肿瘤内科手册[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.
  • 3陈新谦,金有豫,汤光主编.新编药物学[M].第17版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:253-272.
  • 4Ajanj Ja. Docetaxel for gastric and esophageal carcinomas. Oncology,2002, 16 (6) : 89-96.
  • 5Tanaka F, Fukuse T,Wada H, et al. The history, mechanism and clinical use of oral 5-fluoroumcil derivative chemotherapeutic agents. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2000, 1 (2) : 137-164.
  • 6Terashima M, Fujiwara H, Takagane A, et al. Prediction of sensitivity to fluoropy rimidines bymetabolic and target enzyme activities in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer, 2003, 6 ( Suppl 1) :71- 81.
  • 7Yoshisue K, Hironaga K, Yamaguehi S, et al. Reducti on of 5- fluorouracil gastrointestinal ( GI ) toxicity resulting from the protection of thymidylate synthase (TS) in GI tissue by repeated repeated simultaneous administration of potassium oxonate (Oxo) in rats. Cancer Chemother Phar macol, 2000, 46 (1) : 51-56.
  • 8Yoshisue K, Masuda H,Matsushima E, et al. Tissue distribution and biotransformation of potassium oxonate after oral administration of a novel antitumor agent ( drug combination of tegafur, 5-chloro 2, 4 dihydr oxypyridine, and potassium oxonate ) to rats. Drug Metab Dispos, 2000, 28 (10) : 1162-1167.
  • 9Koizumi W, Akiya T, Sato A, et al. Phase II study of S -1 as first line treatment for elderly patients over 75 years of age with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncolagy Group study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol,2010, 65 (6) : 1093-1099.
  • 10Lee JL, Kang YK, Kang HJ, et al. A randomised multicentre phase II trial of capecitabine vs S-1 as first line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent urtresectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer, 2008, 99(4) :584-590.

共引文献88

同被引文献28

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部