期刊文献+

自动紧急制动与可逆预紧安全带共同作用下乘员损伤分析 被引量:11

Analyses of Occupant Injury Affected by Combination of Autonomous Emergency Braking and Reversible Pretensioner Seatbelts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对自动紧急制动(AEB)加重碰撞前的乘员离位现象,探讨了使用可逆预紧安全带改善该现象的有效性。建立了结合自动紧急制动、可逆预紧、主动人体模型的驾驶员侧乘员约束系统模型,通过志愿者实车实验获取碰撞前乘员多种坐姿的安全带约束参数,设定可逆预紧的关键参数范围。分析了AEB与可逆预紧关键参数对碰撞前乘员运动响应及碰撞中乘员损伤风险的影响。结果表明:相同碰撞强度下,AEB增加了乘员的损伤风险,尤其是胸部损伤。可逆预紧安全带通过改善乘员离位状态,可明显降低乘员在正面碰撞中的损伤风险。 Aiming at the occupant seat posture aggravated by AEB,the effectiveness of RPS in improving occupant OOP seating posture was investigated.A numerical simulation approach was utilized to establish a driver-side restraint system model involving AEB,RPS and active human model(AHM).On the basis of volunteer tests which were conducted to obtain the key parameters induced by restrained occupants with different seat postures in the pre-crash phase,the tension force and increased length of seatbelts of RPS were set.The influences imposed by AEB and RPS on the occupants movement in the pre-crash phase were interpretted,as well as the injury risk during in-crash phase.The results indicate that AEB increases occupants injury risk in identical impact severity,especially thorax injury.Nevertheless,occupants injury risk decreases significantly with the utilization of RPS through improving occupants OOP seat posture.
出处 《中国机械工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第16期2259-2266,共8页 China Mechanical Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51205118)
关键词 自动紧急制动 离位 可逆预紧安全带 预紧力 预紧时刻 损伤风险 autonomous emergency braking(AEB) out-of-position(OOP) reversible pretension seatbelt(RPS) pretension force activation time injury risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献32

  • 1肖悦.汽车侧面碰撞结构仿真方法的研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,30(S1):82-85. 被引量:3
  • 2付锐,陈荫三,高延令.中国汽车被动安全性研究现状分析[J].中国公路学报,1996,9(4):95-99. 被引量:4
  • 3林静,韩菲菲.预碰撞安全系统的开发[J].汽车与配件,2007(29):36-39. 被引量:3
  • 4董光,王大志,张金换,黄世霖.Side Structure Sensitivity to Passenger Car Crashworthiness During Pole Side Impact[J].Tsinghua Science and Technology,2007,12(3):290-295. 被引量:1
  • 5William M. Advanced restraint features development., an approach of driver out-of-position thoracic injury mitigation [R]. SAE Paper, 2000-01-2685.
  • 6Keun L J. A correlation methodology of airbag body block test and simulation using optimization technique[R]. SAE Paper, 2004-01-1630.
  • 7Maltese M R. The performance of advanced airbag equipped vehicle in frontal crashes [C]//18th ESV-000414, 2001: 1--5.
  • 8Zhang Honglu, Raman S, Gopal M, et al. Evaluation and comparison of CFD integrated airbag models in 1S-DYNA, MADYMO AND PAM-CRASH [R]. SAE PAPER, 2004- 01-1627.
  • 9MADYMO theory manual, Version6. 2[M]. Shanghai:TNO Road Vehicl Research Instiute, 2004..153--178.
  • 10Eddie Moxey, Neil Johnson, Michael G. McCarthy, et al. Advanced Protection for Vulnerable Road Users University of Surrey [ C ]. Vehicle Aggressivity and Compatibility in Automotive Crashes, and Pedestrian Safety ,2005.

共引文献46

同被引文献50

引证文献11

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部