期刊文献+

当代中国纠纷解决的三种话语及实践探析 被引量:3

Exploration on the Three Discourses and Practice of Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 引入"话语"概念,"道德话语""政治话语""法律话语"可以作为当代中国纠纷解决的三种话语。"道德话语"是以中国传统思想为指导、以儒家伦理中的"礼"为中心建构起来的、强调实质正义的话语体系;"政治话语"是由中国共产党缔造的、为了一定政治利益和政治目标并经历了共产党建设到国家建设演变历程的话语体系;"法律话语"是以保障现代社会"权利—义务"关系为核心、以国家制定的法律规则体系为导向、强调程序正义的话语体系。在中国社会转型期,三种话语指代了三种不同的合法性生成系统,并呈现出"显性分化"与"隐性冲突"两种相貌。这就要求我们在文化自信的基础上探寻三种话语之间的关系协同与权威配置。只有符合中国本土文化的法治建设,才能持久运行,发挥作用。 The article has defined " moral discourse", " political discourse", " legal discourse" as three major discourses of dispute resolution in contemporary China by introducing the concept of " discourse". " Moral discourse" is the discourse system which is guided by the traditional thought of China and constructed by taking the " ritual" of Confucian ethics as the center,it put emphasis on substantive justice; " Political discourse" is the discourse system which is created by the Communist Part of China for the certain political interests and political goals,it has experienced the course from the construction of the Communist Party of China to the national construction; " Legal discourse" is the discourse system which takes the protection of the relationship of " right-obligation" of modern society as the core,takes the legal systems formulated by the state as the guideline and emphasizes procedural justice. In period of social transformation of China,the three discourses have referred to three different generating systems of legality and presented the two kinds of appearance of " explicit differentiation" and " recessive conflict". This requires us to explore the relationship collaboration and authority configuration between the three discourses on the basis of cultural confidence. Only conforming to the local culture of China can guarantee the construction of law smoothly.
作者 石任昊
出处 《中州学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第7期70-76,共7页 Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
基金 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目"转型中国公立医院医患纠纷及其治理机制研究"(2016M591635)
关键词 纠纷解决 道德话语 政治话语 法律话语 法治建设 dispute resolution moral discourse political discourse legal discourse construction of law
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1陆益龙.纠纷解决的法社会学研究:问题及范式[J].湖南社会科学,2009(1):72-75. 被引量:38
  • 2Sherzer Joel.A Discourse-centered Approach to Language and Culture American Anthropologist.1987,vol.89,pp.295-310.
  • 3Conley John,William M.O’Barr.Rules versus Relationships in Small Claim Disputes.In Conflict Talk.edited by Allen D.Grimshaw,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990.
  • 4[荷]冯·戴伊克,施旭,冯冰编译.《话语心理社会》,中华书局1993年版,第69页.
  • 5Foucaul Michel.Power/Knowledge:Selected Interviews and Other Writings,1972-77.Edited by C.Gordon,translated by C.Gordon,Leo Marshall,John Mepham,and Kate Soper.New York:Pantheon.1980,p.83,p.120.
  • 6[美]萨利·安格尔·梅丽:《诉讼的话语---生活在美国社会底层人的法律意识》,郭星华等译,北京大学出版社,2007年,第150-152、152-158、154页.
  • 7[美]昂格尔:《现代社会中的法律》,吴玉章等译,译林出版社,2004年,第96-100页.
  • 8.《礼记·坊记》[M].,..
  • 9[日]滋贺秀三:《中国法文化的考察---以诉讼的形态为素材》,王亚新等译,《明清时期的民事审判与民间契约》,法律出版社,1998年,第1-18页.
  • 10《大清律例》(卷一),徐本奏疏.

二级参考文献64

同被引文献67

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部