三大中文期刊全文数据库收录核心期刊比较研究

Comparative Study on the Included Core Journals of the 3 Chinese Journal Full-text Databases

为了客观反映中国知网、维普和万方三大期刊全文数据库收录2012年版《中文核心期刊要目总览》核心期刊的数量和质量现状,从期刊分类方法、期刊保障程度、数据处理效率和数据处理质量四大方面进行比较分析,对比结果表明中国知网优于维普和万方,维普优于万方。建议服务商从规范著录、质量反馈等方面加强质量建设,组建数据出版集团以提高竞争力,并建议用户选择中国知网期刊全文库检索论文以提高检全率。

In order to reflect objectively the quantity and quality status of core journals in the Guide to Chinese core journals of 2012ed included in CNKI, VIP and WANFANG, this paper compared and analyzed the journal classification method, journal security level, data processing efficiency and quality. The results showed that CNKI was better than VIP and Wan Fang （WF）, and VIP was better than WF. It proposed that the service providers should strengthen the quality construction of database from the standard cataloging and quality feedback, form data publishing group to improve the competitiveness and choose the CJFD of CNKI to improve the recall ratio for users.