期刊文献+

117例亲属肾移植供者术后生活质量调查及多因素分析 被引量:5

Survey of quality of life in 117 living donor kidney transplant pa- tients: multivariate analysis in single center
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨亲属肾移植供者术后生活质量及相关影响因素,为提高供者术后生命质量提供参考依据。方法运用横断面调查研究方法以统一印制的调查表对本中心2006—2008年所实施的117例亲属。肾移植供者术后实施问卷调查,并以同期健康人群作为对照组。调查内容包括社会人口学特征、手术并发症、经济状况、对亲属活体肾移植知晓状况、家庭支持情况、医疗保障及社会福利、术后日常锻炼等,以中文版SF-36量表测定生活质量。以t检验、方差分析和逐步回归对每一种影响因素进行分析。结果亲属肾移植供者心理健康高于健康人群(P〈0.05);生活质量总分及其他各维度评分与健康人群比较,差异无统计学意义(P均〉0.05)。单因素分析时,年龄、文化程度、经济状况、体育锻炼等4种因素与生活质量的多个领域均有关系。进一步多因素分析,在排除了各因素之间的相互影响后,对供者术后生活质量的主要影响因素分别是文化程度、经济状况、体育锻炼(P〈0.05)。结论术前应从社会心理等多角度对供者进行严格筛选,良好的社会心理背景、必要的心理指导及术后定期随访是保障供者术后良好生活质量的关键。 Objective To evaluate the postoperative quality of life of donors in living donor renal transplantation patients. Methods One hundred and seventeen donors were involved in present study from 2006-2008. A cross- sectional survey was performed with questionnaire research to all the donors who received living donor nephrectomy during this period. The questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics, smgieal complications, economic status, donors awareness status, family support, the health care, social welfare and daily exercise after surgery. The Chinese version of SF-36 was used as the measurement of quality of life. The statistic analyze include T test, a- nalysis of variance and stepwise regression analysis. Results The donors' mental health status was better than the healthy population (P 〈 0.05). The difference of quality of life and scores of other dimensions compared with the healthy population was not statistically significant (P 〉 0.05). In univariate analysis, four kinds of fields such as age, education level, economic status and physical exercise were associated with quality of life. In further multivari- ate analysis, with exclusion of the interaction between various factors, the main factors for postoperative quality of life are the cultural, economic status and physical activity (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions Social and psychological fac- tor should be concerned in donor's preoperative screening. Good social psychological background, the necessary psychological intervention and postoperative follow-up maybe play an important role to improve the postoperative quality of life in living donor renal transplantation.
出处 《国际外科学杂志》 2016年第5期332-335,共4页 International Journal of Surgery
关键词 活体供者 肾移植 生活质量 Living donors Renal transplantation Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Gres P, Avances C, Iborra F, et al. Long- term morbidity of living donor kidney harvesting[J]. Prog Urol, 2007, 17(2) : 194-198.
  • 2朱兰,曾凡军,刘斌,蒋继贫,张伟杰,陈知水,林正斌,明长生,陈忠华.亲属活体供肾者术后早期的安全性评估[J].中华器官移植杂志,2006,27(5):268-270. 被引量:21
  • 3李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113. 被引量:2222
  • 4王红妹,李鲁,沈毅.中文版SF-36量表用于杭州市区居民生命质量研究[J].中华预防医学杂志,2001,35(6):428-430. 被引量:308
  • 5中华人民共和国统计局.2010年度中国统计年鉴,274.ht.tp ://www. stats, gov. cn/ljsj/ndsj/2010, rar.
  • 6Kassiske BL, Snyder J, Matas AT, et al. The impact of transplan- tation on survival with kidney failure [ J ]. Clin Transpl, 2000: 135-143.
  • 7Starzl TE. Living donors: eon [J]. Transplant Proe, 1987, 19 (1): 174-175.
  • 8Dowie M. "We have a donor" : the bold new world of organ trans- planting [ M]. New York: St Martin's press, 1988: 52.
  • 9Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health sur- vey (SF -36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection [ J]. Med Care, 1992, 30: 475.
  • 10Johnson EM, Anderson JK. Long-term follow-up of living kidney donors: Quality of life after donation [ J]. Transplantation, 1999, 67(5) : 717-721. DOI: 10. 1097/00007890-199903150-00013.

二级参考文献26

  • 1于守洋 陈炳卿.社会营养.营养与食品卫生学,第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.100-101.
  • 2Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 3Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 4Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 5Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 6顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 7Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 8Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 9Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.
  • 10Mathias SD, Fifer SK, Patrick DL.Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:403-412.

共引文献2501

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部