期刊文献+

探讨单球囊双侧交替扩张后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效 被引量:2

Toobserve the Efficacy of Single Balloon Bilateral Alternating Expansionin the Treatmen to fosteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨单球囊双侧交替扩张后凸成形术对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折治疗效果。方法整群选取该院2013年1月—2015年12月骨科收治的68例骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者,划分成严重组(32例)与一般组(36例)。全部实施单球囊双侧交替扩张后凸成形术,观察两组的临床疗效。结果骨水泥注射量(3.21±1.23)m L低于一般组(P<0.05);椎体前缘高度恢复率(18.87±6.54)%、椎体中部高度恢复率(21.34±9.36)%低于一般组(P<0.05)。结论单球囊双侧交替扩张后凸成形术对老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩一般骨折与严重骨折的临床治疗效果显著。 Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of single balloon double balloon dilation in the treatment of os-teoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Methods Group selection 68 cases of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures treated in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2015 were divided into severe group (32 cases) and normal group (36 cases). Full implementation of the single balloon bilateral alternating expansion, the clinical efficacy of two groups were observed. Results (3.21 ±1.23) mL bone cement injection volume is lower than general group (P〈0.05);vertebral height restoration rate (18.87 ±6.54) %, the middle part of the vertebral body height recovery rate (21.34 ± 9.36)%lower than nor-mal group (P〈 0.05). Conclusion The bilateral alternating extension of single spherical capsule can significantly improve the clinical therapeutic effect of the treatment of senile osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and severe fractures.
出处 《中外医疗》 2016年第20期48-49,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 单球囊双侧交替扩张后凸成形术 骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折 疗效 Single spherical capsule bilateral alternating expansion Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献120

  • 1杨惠林,牛国旗,梁道臣,王根林,孟斌,陈亮,陆俭,周云,毛海青,赵刘军,刘小勇,顾晓晖,倪才方,唐天驷.单球囊与双球囊后凸成形术对椎体复位作用的研究[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(21):1299-1302. 被引量:72
  • 2杨惠林,牛国旗,王根林,陈亮,陆俭,赵刘军,顾晓晖,唐天驷.椎体后凸成形术治疗周壁破损的骨质疏松性椎体骨折[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(3):165-169. 被引量:94
  • 3Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, et al. A randomized trial of ver- tebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures[ J]. N Engl J Med, 2009 ,361:557-68.
  • 4Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty P J, et al. A randomized trial of ver- tebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2009 , 361:569-79.
  • 5Aebi M. Vertebroplasty:about sense and nonsense of an controlled con- trolled randomized prospective trials [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2009 , 18 : 1247-8.
  • 6Bono CM, Heggeness M, Mick C,et al. North American spine society:newly released vertebroplasty randomized controlled trials : a tale of two trials[J]. Spine J,2010 , 10:238-40.
  • 7Jung JY, Lee MH, Ahn JM. Leakage of polymethylmethacrylate in percu- taneouswertebroplasty: comparison of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with and without an intravertebral vacuum cleft [ J ]. J Comput Assist Tomogr,2006 ,30:501-6.
  • 8Hulme PA. Ebroplasty and kyphoplasty:a systematic review of 69 clinical studies [ J ]. Spine, 2006 , 31 : 1983 -2001.
  • 9Steinmann J,Tingey CT, Cruz G,et al. Biomechanieal com- parison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ) , 2005,30 ( 2 ) : 201 - 205.
  • 10Tohmeh AG, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, et al. Biomechanical ef- ficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for themanagement of osteoporotic compression fi'actures [ J ]. Spine( Phila Pa 1976), 1999,24( 17 ) :1772 - 1776.

共引文献89

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部