《经义考·通说》引文续考

Subsequent Study of Quoted Essays in Jingyi Kao·Tong Shuo

朱彝尊《经义考·通说》四卷辑录春秋至清初诸人关于经学的观点,共499则,引文均未注明出处,且多经剪裁。通过查考引文的原始出处,有助于恢复引文本始面目,利于增加学界转引《经义考·通说》相关材料时的真实性和准确性。在武汉大学司马朝军教授《<经义考·通说>疏证》和笔者《<经义考·通说>引文考辨十二则》的基础上,根据最新研习所得,详细考订朱彝尊《经义考·通说》中32则引文出处,并辨正《<经义考·通说>疏证》4处溯源之误。

ZhuYizun’s four volumes of Jingyi Kao ？Tong Shuo, with a total of 499 items, are the collection of scholars’ opinions on Confucian classics from the Spring and Autumn Period to the early days of Qing Dynasty. Most of the quotations are clipped without indicating their sources. Therefore, it will, by examining the original sources of the quotations, help to discover them and enhance the authenticity and accuracy when scholars quote the related materials of Jingyi Kao .Tong Shuo. Based on Annotation of Jingyi Kao .Tong Shuo by Professor Si-ma Chaojun from Wuhan University and my Arguments for Twelve Essays in the Introduction to Jingyi Kao · Tong Shuo, this paper attempts to research the sources of 32 quoted essays in Jingyi Kao · Tong Shuo and tries to identify and correct the four errors in the tracing of source in Professor Si-ma＇s.