南海仲裁案的国际法分析

International Law Analysis of the South China Sea Arbitration Case

在南海仲裁案中,菲律宾试图以《联合国海洋法公约》中"专属经济区"主权权利否定中国主张的南海"九段线"内的"历史性权利",毫无疑问是对中国的属地权威及其主权权利的侵犯。这实质上是以1982年建立的海洋法制度挑战"二战"后的国际法条约体系,以求达到对南海区域海洋资源重新分配之目的。如按这种方式进行海洋区域资源的重新分配并以此为基准去建立海洋"新秩序",那么不仅在南海,恐怕整个世界都要重新洗牌,其结果极有可能引发区域冲突甚至世界大战。

In the South China Sea arbitration case, Philippines attempts to use ＂exclusive economic zone＂ in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea to deny China＇s claim of historic rights in ＂Ninedash Line＂ of the South China Sea, which no doubt is a violation of China＇s territorial authority and its sovereignty. This is essentially posing challenge to the international law system after World War II by using the marine law system established in 1982, to achieve the purpose of redistribution of marine resources in the South China Sea. If reallocation of marine regional resources are carried out in this manner and ＂a new order of the ocean＂ established on this basis, then not only in the South China Sea, but the whole world will be reshuffled. The result is likely to lead to regional conflicts and even new world war.