期刊文献+

电力发展对中国经济增长的影响及其区域差异 被引量:23

Effect of electricity development on China's economic growth and its regional difference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1990年以来,随着中国电力体制改革的深入,电力基础设施与经济同步发展。由于电力生产与电力消费存在着显著的空间差异,电力发展对经济增长的影响可能存在空间差异。本文利用1990—2011年省级面板数据,基于增长回归模型,采用动态面板分析方法,以电力投资率和发电装机容量作为衡量电力发展的指标,检验电力发展对经济增长的影响以及这种影响的区域间差异。实证研究的主要发现如下:首先,电力发展对经济增长有显著的正面影响,而且其长期影响明显高于短期影响。其中,电力投资率每增加1个百分点,短期经济增长率提高0.076个百分点,长期经济增长率提高0.493个百分点;发电装机容量每增加1个百分点,短期经济增长率提高0.381个百分点,长期经济增长率提高1.905个百分点。其次,电力发展对经济增长的影响具有显著的地区差异,对东部地区的经济增长影响显著高于西部地区。其中,电力投资率增加1个百分点对东部地区的经济增长率影响高于西部地区达0.913个百分点;电力装机容量增加1个百分点对东部地区的经济增长率影响高于西部地区达0.959个百分点。实证结果表明,电力发展对各地区经济增长影响是不平衡的,这种影响对区域经济协调发展起到了负面作用。基于实证研究,给出如下政策建议:首先,考虑到中国经济在未来20年中仍将保持较高增速,中国应继续促进电力发展投资,以促进经济增长。其次,从政策导向来看,电力发展政策应当充分加强电力发展对区域协调发展的作用,使得西部地区能从电力输出中获得更高收益,提高电力发展对区域经济增长影响的公平性。 With the regulation reforms of power sector since 1990, the development of electricity infrastructure is associated with economic development in China. Due to the significant regional differences of power generation and consumption, the effect of electricity development on economic growth may differ across the regions. Using the provincial-level panel data in China from 1990 to 2011 and adopting the dynamic panel analysis estimation based on growth regression model, this paper investigates the growth effect of electricity development which is measured by electricity investment and installed capacity of electricity, and examines the regional difference of this effect. The main empirical findings of this paper can be summarized as follows. First, the electricity development has a significantly positive effect on economic growth in China and the long-run effect is larger than the short-run effect. For examples, one percentage-point increase in electricity investment ( percentage of GDP) generates 0. 076 percentage-point increase in the short-term economic growth rate and 0.493 percentage-point increase in the long-term economic growth rate ; one percentage-point increase in the installed capacity of electricity generates 0. 381 and 1. 905 percentage-point increase in the short-term and the long-term economic growth rate respectively. Second, the effect of electricity development on economic growth has a significant regional difference. For examples, for one percentage-point increase in electricity investment ( percentage of GDP), the growth effect is 0.913 percentage-point higher in the coastal regions than that in the west regions ; for one percentage-point increase in the installed capacity of electricity, the growth effect is 0. 959 percentage-point higher in the coastal regions than that in the west regions. These results imply that the growth effect of electricity development is unbalanced across different regions, which imposes a negative effect for the coordinated development of regional economy. Based on the empirical results, some policy suggestions are offered. First, considering that China is still expected to keep a relative high growth rate in the next two decades, China needs to promote the investment to the electricity sector to facilitate economic growth. Second, the electricity development policies should sufficiently enhance the role of electricity development on the coordinated development of regional economy through the west regions benefiting more from electricity output, and improve the equality of electricity development's growth effect across the regions.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期34-41,共8页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"经济转型过程中的收入分配与储蓄倾向:实证证据与政策含义"(批准号:71273006) 清华大学自主科研计划资助 中国社会科学院创新工程项目"人口老龄化经济增长效应理论与实证研究"
关键词 电力发展 电力基础设施 经济增长 区域差异 development of electricity electricity infrastructure economic growth regional difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1JIMENEZ E. Human and physical infrastructure: public investment and pricing policies in developing countries [ M ] /// BEHRMAN J, SRINIVASAN T. Handbook of development economics: Volume 3B. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, North-Holland, 1995:2773-2843.
  • 2KHADAROO A J, SEETANAH B. Transport infrastructure and foreign direct investment [ J ]. Journal of international development, 2010, 22(1) :103 -123.
  • 3RLLER L H, WAVERMAN L. Telecommunications infrastrneture and economic development: a simultaneous approach [ J ]. The american economic review, 2001,91 (4) : 909 -923.
  • 4CZERNICH N, FALCK O, KRETSCHMER T, et al. Broadband infrastructure and economic growth [ J ]. The economic journal, 2011, 121 : 505 -532.
  • 5DEMURGER S. Infrastructure development and economic growth: an explanation for regional disparities in China? [ J ]. Journal of comparative economics, 2001, 29( 1 ): 95-117.
  • 6BANERJEE A, DUFLO E, QIAN N. On the road: access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China [ R ]. NBER working paper, 2012:17897.
  • 7刘生龙,胡鞍钢.交通基础设施与中国区域经济一体化[J].经济研究,2011,46(3):72-82. 被引量:457
  • 8FAN S, ZHANG X. Infrastructure and regional economic development in rural China [ J]. China economic review, 2004, 15 (2) : 203 -214.
  • 9LEE K S, ANAS A. Costs of different infrastructure: the case of nigerian manufacturing [J]. Urban studies, 1992, 29(7) : 1071 - 1092.
  • 10MASIH A M M , MASIH R. Electricity consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modeling techiniques [ J ]. Energy economics, 1996, 18(3): 165-183.

二级参考文献44

  • 1陈敏、桂琦寒、陆铭、陈钊,2005:《经济开放与国内市场一体化进程》,2005年中国经济学年会论文.
  • 2Anderson, J. E. , 1979, "A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation", American Economic Review, 69(1 ), 106-116.
  • 3Behrens, K., 2004, " International Integration and Regional Inequalities: How Important is National Infrastructure?", CORE Discussion Paper No. 2004/66.
  • 4Bergstrand, J. , 1985, "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence", Review of Economics and Statistics, 67:474-481.
  • 5Bergstrand, J., 1989, " The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, anti the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade" , Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 143-153.
  • 6Demurger, S. 2001, " Infrastructure and Economic Growth: An Explanation for Regional Disparities in China?", Journal of Comparative Economics, 29: 95-117,.
  • 7Fleisher, B. , Li, H.Z. & Zhao, M. Q. , 2009, "Human Capital, Economic Growth, and Regional Inequality in China", Journal of Development Economics, 2010, 92: 215-231.
  • 8Gramlieh E. M. , 1994, "Infrastructure Investment : A Review Essay", Journal of Economic Literature, 32 : 1176-1196.
  • 9Harrigan, J. , 2002, "Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws", NBER Working Paper No. 8675.
  • 10Helliwell, J. F. , 1996, "Do National Borders Matter for Quebec ' s Trade ?", Canadian Journal of Economics, 26 (3), 507-522.

共引文献503

同被引文献332

引证文献23

二级引证文献181

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部