全球价值链视角下中国总出口的增加值分解被引量：22

Value-Added Decomposition of China's Gross Export Under Global Value Chains

导出

摘要基于2011年世界投入产出表,采用总出口分解模型,将中国等40个世界主要国家(地区)的总出口完全分解为不同的增加值项目和重复计算项目,并衍生出增加值贸易的相关指标。从行业层面,测算了中国各行业的增加值出口规模及其实现路径。依据"吸收地原则",研究了我国总体、行业增加值出口的地区(国别)去向。结果显示,中国总出口中国外成分(VS)所占比例为21.77%,高于美国、日本等发达国家,其重复计算项的比例为24.53%;中国传统出口规模较小的农业、狩猎业、林业及渔业、采掘业和服务行业,通过将行业产出用于制造业行业产品的生产,从而实现本行业的增加值出口,其增加值出口规模位居行业前列;北美地区、欧盟地区是中国增加值出口的主要吸收地,发达国家(如美国、日本、德国)和金砖国家(如印度)的国内最终需求对中国GDP的拉动效应显著。 Based on World Input-Output Table in 2011, this paper completely decompo- ses the gross export of forty major countries all over the world into different value-added i- tems and double counting items, and derives related indicators about value-added trade. From the perspective of industry, this paper measures each industry＇s value-added export and its realization path in China. According to absorption principle, this paper analyzes the country （region） destination of China＇s value-added export. The results show that. the foreign con- tent share in China＇s gross export is 21.77%, higher than other developed countries （such as United States and Japan）, and its double counting share is 24.53%. Although low in tra- ditional trade scale, Agriculture, hunting, forestry and fisheries, mining industry and serv- ice industry realizes its value-added export by using its output as input of manufacturing industry＇s output for export. North America and EU are the major absorption destination of China＇s value-added export, and final demand of developed counties （Such as United States, Japan, German） and BRICs countries （Such as India） have a higher stimulating effect on China＇s GDP.

作者韩中

机构地区南京财经大学经济学院

出处《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期129-144,共16页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics

基金教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(16YJC910004) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD) 江苏高校品牌专业建设工程资助项目江苏省"青蓝工程"项目的资助

关键词总出口增加值价值链投入产出 Gross Export Value-Added Value Chain Input and Output

分类号 F740.6 [经济管理—国际贸易]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1Dedrick J., Kraemer K. L. , Linden G. , 2010, Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains?: A Study of the IPod and Notebook PCs [J], Industrial and Corporate Change, 19 (1), 81-116.
2Guillaume D. , Rifflart C. , Schweisguth D. , 2011, Who Produces for Whom in the World Econo- my? [J], Canadian Journal of Economics, 44 (4), 1403-1437.
3Dean J. M. , Fung K. C. , Wang Z. , 2011, Measuring Vertical Specialization : The Case of China [J].Review of International Economics, 19 (4), 609-625.
4Grossman G. M. , Rossi-Hansberg E. , 2008, Trading Tasks : A Simple Theory of Offshoring [J]. American Economic Review, 98 (5), 1978-1997.
5Hummels D. , Ishii J. , Yi K. , 2001, The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 54, 75-96.
6Jones R. , Kierzkowski H. , 2001, A framezoork for Fragmentation, In: Arndt S. , Kierzkowski H. (eds), Fragmentation.. New Production Patterns in the World Economy [M], Oxford University Press.
7Johnson C. , Noguera G. , 2012, Accounting for Intermediates : Production Sharing and Trade in Value Added [J], Journal of International Economics, 86 (2), 224-236.
8Koopman R. , Wang Z. , Wei S. , 2008, HowMuch of Chinese Exports Is Really Made in China? Assessing Domestic Value-Added When Processing Trade is Pervasive [R], National Bureau of Economic Re- search Working Paper, No. 14109.
9Koopman R. , Wang Z. , Wei S. , 2012, Estimating Domestic Content in Exports When Processing Trade Is Pervasive [J], Journal of Development Economics, 99 (1), 178-189.
10Koopman R. , Wang Z. , Wei S. , 2014, Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Ex- ports [J], American Economic Review, 104 (2), 459-494.

二级参考文献108

1关兵.附加值贸易统计方法视角下的中国外贸发展状况[J].世界贸易组织动态与研究（上海对外贸易学院学报）,2013,20(3):16-24. 被引量：12
2北京大学中国经济研究中心课题组.中国出口贸易中的垂直专门化与中美贸易[J].世界经济,2006,29(5):3-11. 被引量：327
3刘遵义,陈锡康,杨翠红,Leonard K.Cheng,K.C.Fung,Yun-Wing Sung,祝坤福,裴建锁,唐志鹏.非竞争型投入占用产出模型及其应用——中美贸易顺差透视[J].中国社会科学,2007(5):91-103. 被引量：322
4《中国统计年鉴2006》.
5Batey, P. W. J., and M. J. Weeks, An Extended Input-Output Model Incorporating Employed, Unemployed, and In-migrant Households. Papers of the Regional Science Association, vol. 62, 1987.
6Hummels, D. , D. Rapoport, and K-M. Yi, Vertical Specialization and the Changing Nature of World Trade, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, vol. 4, no. 2, 1998.
7Bohlin, L. , and L. M. Widell, Estimation of Commodity-by-Commodity Input-Output Matrices. Economic Systems Research, vol. 18, 2006.
8Leontief, Wassily W. , Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States. Review of Economic Statistics, vol. 18, 1936.
9Leontief, Wassily W. , et al. , Studies in the Structure of the American Economy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1953.
10He, Shiqiang, and Polenske, K. R. , Interregional Trade, the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Theorem and Leontief's Paradox, paper presented to the 12th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, New York City, 1998.