期刊文献+

汇率基本面模型对人民币汇率的预测能力 被引量:23

Forecasting Ability of Different Fundamental Exchange Rate Model on RMB
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文选取五个主流的汇率基本面模型,使用2005年汇改后的人民币兑美元、欧元、日元、英镑汇率数据进行样本内拟合和样本外预测,并通过计算损失函数和SPA统计量比较五种模型的预测能力。实证结果表明:随机游走模型短期内具有更优的预测能力,但中长期内,汇率基本面模型具有更优的预测能力;总体来讲,汇率基本面模型的预测能力优于随机游走模型,人民币汇率不存在"汇率失联之谜";对不同的货币,具有最优预测能力的模型不同。 Selecting five fundamental exchange rate models, this paper fits and forecasts the RMB exchange rate with the data in-sample and out-sample after 2005. Furthermore, this paper compares the abilities of different models used to forecast the RMB exchange rate through loss function and SPA test. The results show that random walk model has better predictability in short-run, while in the medium-to-long term fundament exchange rate mod- els forecast better. In general, fundamental exchange rate models have better predictability and exchange rate of RMB is close to economic fundamentals. For different currencies, there exist different models to fit and forecast them.
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期145-160,共16页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
关键词 人民币汇率 汇率基本面模型 损失函数 SPA检验 Exchange Rate of RMB Fundamental Exchange Rate Model Loss Func-tion SPA test
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Abhyankar A. , Sarno L. , Valente G. , 2005, Exchange Rates and Fundamentals: Evidence on the Economic Value of Predictability [J], Journal of International Economics, 66 (2), 325-348.
  • 2Bianco D. M. , Camacho M. , Quiros G. P. , 2012, Short-run Forecasting of the Euro-dollar Exchange Rate with Economic Fundamentals [J], Journal of International Money and Finance, 31 (2), 377-396.
  • 3Bekaert G. , Wei M. , Xing Y. H. , 2007, Uncovered Interest Rate Parity and the Term Structure [J], Journal of International Money and Finance, 26 (6), 1038-1069.
  • 4Bhargava V. , Dania V. , Malhotra D. K. , 2011, Covered Interest Rate Parity among BRIC Na- tions [J], Journal of Business - Economic Study, 17 (1), 37.
  • 5Cheung Y.W., Chinn M.D. , Pascual A.G., 2005, Empirical Exchange Rate Models of the Nineties: AreAny Fit to Survive? [J], Journal of International Money and Finance, 24 (7), 1150-1175.
  • 6Clark P. B. , MacDonald R. , 1999, Exchange Rates and Economic Fundamentals: A Methodolog- ical Comparison of BEERs and FEERs, In MacDonald R. , Stein J. (Eds.), Equilibrium Exchange Rates [C], Kluwer Academic Publishers, 285-322.
  • 7Diebold X. F. , Mariano S. R. , 1995, Comparing Predictive Accuracy [J]. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20 (1), 134-144.
  • 8Engel C., West K.D., 2005, Exchange Rates and Fundamentals [R], NBER Working Paper, No. 10723.
  • 9Engel R. F. , Granger C. W. J. , 1987, Cointegration and Error Correction - Representation Esti- mationand Testing [J], Econometrica, 55 (2), 251-276.
  • 10Engel C. , Mark N. C. , West K. D. , 2007, Exchange Rate Models Are Not as Bad as You Think [R], NBER Working Paper, No. 13318.

二级参考文献150

共引文献202

同被引文献149

引证文献23

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部