论法院判决在仲裁中的既判力

On Res Judicata of Court Decision in Arbitration

法院判决的既判力,主要是针对后诉判决,避免了对已决事项在后诉审判中出现相互矛盾的情况。法院判决的既判力对于仲裁庭而言是否也应具有相同的效力;法院判决与仲裁裁决发生冲突时,仲裁裁决是否当然无效;法院判决对国内仲裁裁决和国际仲裁裁决是否具有相同的既判力。这些问题,都需要对法院判决的既判力适用范围予以明确。

Res judicata mainly applies to post-litigation in order to avoid conflicts on judged facts of post-litigation. All the following questions suggest that the scope of application of res judicata should be explicitly stipulated. Does res judicata have the same effect in terms of the arbitral tribunal？ When does a conflict exist between the court decision and the arbitration？ Is the arbitral decision invalid？ Dose the court decisions have the same res judicata on domestic and international arbitral decision？ In practice, some court decision in arbitration are beyond the res judicata, therefore, the judicial intervention in arbitration should try to maintain proper modesty.