定量要素的体系性地位——立足于客观归责理论的考察

Systematic Position of Quantitative Elements—— A Study Based on the Objective Imputation Theory

我国刑法文本中广泛存在定量要素,不宜将其完全作为构成要件要素或者决定犯罪成立的客观处罚条件加以对待。客观归责理论为界定定量要素的体系性地位提供了重要的理论工具,规范保护目的和构成要件效力范围这两个规则划定了基本构成要件的不法内涵。若定量要素可以归责于基本构成要件行为,则意味其可以被还原成为构成要件要素;若定量要素不能归责于基本构成要件行为,则依具体情况分别成立结果加重犯中的加重结果、客观处罚条件、基于刑事政策考虑而规定的定量要素三种类型。

There are widespread quantitative elements in China% criminal law, which should not be entirelytreated as constituent elements or objective punishment conditions. Objective imputation theory can be seen as animportant theoretical tool to define the systematic position of the quantitative elements and both standardized protectionpurposes and validity scope of the constituent elements constitute the connotation of basic constituent elements.If quantitative elements can be attributable to the behavior of the basic constituent elements, it means that it can bereduced to the constituent elements; if not, depending on the circumstances, it leads to three different types： aggravatedresults in aggregated consequential offense, objective punishment conditions and quantitative elementsbased on criminal policy.