1Papillo JL, St John TL, Leiman G. Effectiveness of the ThinPrep Imaging System: clinical experience in a low risk screening population. Diagn Cytopathol, 2014, 36(3):155-160.
2Dawson AE. Can we change the way we screen? the ThinPrep Imaging System. Cancer, 2004, 102(6):340-344.
3Schledermann D, Hyldebrandt T, Ejersbo D, et al. Automated screening versus manual screening: a comparison of the ThinPrep imaging system and manual screening in a time study. Diagn Cytopathol, 2007, 35(6):348-352.
4Biscotti CV, Dawson AE, Dziura B, et al. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System. Am J Clin Pathol, 2005, 123(2):281-287.
6Rtmowicz CD. Molecular screening for cervical cancer - time to give up Pap tests? N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(16):1650-1653.
7Dziura B, Quinn S, Richard K. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol, 2012, 50(3):309-311.
8Geisinger KR, Vrbin C, Grzybicki DM, et al. Interobserver variability in human papillomavirus test results in cervicovaginal cytologic specimens in terpreted as atypical squamous cells. Am J Clin Pathol, 2007, 128(6):1010-1014.
2Singh M, Mehrotra S, Kalra N, et al. Correlation of DNA ploidy with progression of cervical cancer [ J] . J" Cancer Epi- demiol, 2008 (1) : 1687 -1694.
3Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et aL Global cancer statistics [J] .CACancerJClin, 2011, 61 (2): 69 -90.
4Schledermann D, Hyldebrandt T. Automated screening versus manual screening: a comparison of the ThinPrep imaging sys- tem and manual screening in a time study [ J] . Diagn Cyto-pathol, 2007, 35 (6) : 348 - 352.
5Boost. A comparison of screening times between the ThinPrep imager and conventional cytology [ J] . Diagn Cytopathol, 2009, 37 (9): 661-664.
6Halford JA, Batty T, Boost T, et al. Comparison of the sensi- tivity of conventional cytology and the ThinPrep Imaging System for 1 083 biopsy confirmed high- grade squamous lesions [J] Diagn Cytopathol, 2010, 38 (5): 318-326.
7Chivukula M, Saad RS, Elishaev E, et al. Introduction of the Thin Prep Imaging System (TIS) : experience in a high volume academic practice [J] . Cyto Journal, 2007, 4 (1) : 6 -8.
8Dziura B, Quinn S, Richard K. Performance of an imaging system vs. manual screening in the detection of squamous intra- epithelial lesions of the uterine cervix [ J] . Acta Cytol, 2006, 50 (3): 309-311.
9Lozano R. Comparison of computer - assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology J] . Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 104 (1): 134-138.
10Duby JM, DiFurio MJ. Implementation of the ThinPrep Ima- ging System in a tertiary military medical center [J] . Canc- er, 2009, 117 (4): 264-270.
