期刊文献+

基于易损性分析的RC框架-填充墙结构地震直接经济损失计算 被引量:8

Seismic direct economic loss analysis of infilled RC frame structure based on fragility analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 面对地震灾害造成的巨大经济损失,对地震直接经济损失作出合理的评价将为地震保险费率的厘定和各利益相关者的决策提供依据。借鉴PEER提出的单体建筑基于性能的损失评估理论,按照该理论的各分析模块,对某小学框架-填充墙结构综合楼建立三维空间模型,选择24条地震动记录,进行增量动力分析,进而得到不同损伤状态的易损性曲线,在此基础上进行了地震直接经济损失分析,并对是否考虑填充墙平面内外相互作用的2种建模方式下的易损性与经济损失进行了比较。分析结果表明:这一基于全概率理论模块化的分析方法能够对单体建筑在设定地震动强度下的直接经济损失进行有效的评估。不考虑填充墙平面内外相互作用的建模方式低估了结构的抗震性能,从而高估地震直接经济损失。 In the face of the huge economic losses caused by the earthquake disaster, the reasonable evaluation of the direct economic loss of earthquake will provide the basis for determining the earthquake insurance premium rate and decision - making for the stakeholders. Based on PEER performance assessment methodology of economic los- ses for individual building, the three - dimensional model of a 6 - storey infilled frame comprehensive building of a primary school was built and analyzed according to the analysis modules of this methodology. 24 ground motion re- cords were selected to carry out incremental dynamic analysis and fragility curves of different damage states were de- rived. Then the direct economic loss of earthquake were analyzed. And fragility and economic losses of the model with and without consideration of in - plane and out - of - plane interaction of infill walls were compared. Analytical results show that the modularized analysis approach based on the full probability theory can effectively evaluate the direct economic losses of the individual building under the given ground motion intensity. Without considering in - plane and out - of - plane interaction of infill walls, the performance of the structure is underestimated, and then the direct economic loss is overestimated.
出处 《世界地震工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期13-20,共8页 World Earthquake Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51268036) 国家自然科学基金项目(51578273) 教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT13068)
关键词 地震易损性 直接经济损失 损失评估 保险费率厘定 增量动力分析 seismic fragility direct economic loss loss analysis premium rate determination incremental dynamic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Porter K A, Kiremidjian A S. Assembly - based vulnerability of buildings and its uses in seismic performance evaluation and risk management deci- sion making [ R]. Report No. 139. Stanford, California: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, 2001.
  • 2Krawinkler H. Van Nuys Hotel building tested report: Exercising seismic performance assessment [ R]. PEER Report 2005/11. Berkeley, Cali- fornia: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, 2005.
  • 3Aslani H, Miranda E. Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings [ R]. Report No. 157. Stanford, CA: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, 2005.
  • 4韩建平,黄林杰.孙小云.考虑填充墙平面内外相互作用评估RC框架-填充墙结构抗整体性倒塌能[J].工程力学,2015,http://gclx.tsinghua.edu.cn/CN/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.02.0098.
  • 5Aslani H, Miranda E. Probability - based structural response analysis [ J ]. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27 ( 8 ) : 1151 - 1163.
  • 6Miranda E, Aslani H. Pmbabilistic response assessment for building - specific loss estimation [ R]. PEER Report 2003/03. Berkeley, California: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of Califoruia at Berkeley, 2003.
  • 7Mitrani - Reiser J, Beck J. An ounce of prevention: Probabilistic loss estimation for performance - based earthquake engineering [ D ]. Pasadena, California: Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, California Institute of Technology, 2007.
  • 8Ramirez C M, Miranda E. Building -specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance -based earthquake engineering [ R]. Re- port No. 171. Stanford, California: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, 2009.
  • 9GB/T18208.4-2011地震现场工作第4部分:灾害直接损失评估[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.

同被引文献23

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部