期刊文献+

四类场地基本周期对比分析 被引量:7

Comparison of fundamental periods of four type sites
下载PDF
导出
摘要 场地基本周期是工程场地的重要特征参数。筛选了国内235个剪切波速完备的深达工程基岩工程地质钻孔,其中Ⅰ类场地14个,Ⅱ类场地125个,Ⅲ类场地84个,Ⅳ类场地12个,利用可反映土层结构影响的逐层单自由度法计算不同类别场地基本周期,并统计分析了这四类场地的基本周期的分布范围。计算结果表明:(1)四类场地的基本周期均大致呈正态分布,各类场地的平均值差别明显;(2)对于Ⅱ类、Ⅲ类和Ⅳ类场地而言,场地类别相邻的场地基本周期有重叠;(3)场地地震反应分析结果表明:场地类别不同,但基本周期相似的场地地震反应亦基本相同。 Fundamental periods are key paremeters for engineering sites. The 235 engineering sites which belong to different site categories are selected, amone them there are 14 type- Ⅰ sites, 125 type -Ⅱ sites,84 type-Ⅲ site and 14 type - IV sites. The fundamental period formula which consider soil layer structer is used to calculate the fundamental periods of the 235 sites. For each site category, the distribution of fundamental periods are obtained by statistical analysis. The results show that ( 1 ) for each site categories, the fundamental periods obey normal distribu- tion, and there are obvious difference among the mean values of different site categories, (2) the fundametal peri- ods of the neighbor site categories are overlaped except of type -Ⅰ sites, ( 3 ) the analysis of site earthquake shows that their sesimic respones might be similar if their fundamental periods are equal to each other.
出处 《世界地震工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期48-52,共5页 World Earthquake Engineering
基金 中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(2013002) 黑龙江省科学基金资助项目(QC2012C105)
关键词 场地分类 基本周期 平均值 分布特征 统计分析 site classification site fundamental period mean value distribution feature statistical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1British Standard. Eurocode 8 : Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part i : General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings [ S ]. BS EN 1998 - 1:2004.
  • 2Building Seismic Safety Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Earthquake Hazards Reduct ion Program. NEHRP Recom- mended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA450) , Part 1 : Provisions, ( 2003 ed ) [ S ]. Washing- ton D C: Building Seismic Safety Council, 2004.
  • 3Building Seismic Safety Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Earthquake Hazards Reduct ion Program. NEHRP Recom- mended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other St ructures (FEMA450) , Part 2: Commentary, ( 2003 ed) [ S]. Wash- ington D C: Building Seismic Safety Council, 2004.
  • 4The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT). Building Standard Law of Japan[ s]. Tokyo, Japan. 2007.
  • 5GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • 6《工程地质手册》编委会.工程地质手册(第四版)[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006.
  • 7童广才,刘康和.场地卓越周期的确定[J].电力勘测,2000(2):43-46. 被引量:13
  • 8齐文浩,薄景山,刘红帅.水平成层场地基本周期的估算公式[J].岩土工程学报,2013,35(4):779-784. 被引量:21
  • 9廖振鹏 李大华.地表土层地震反应的等效线性化解法[A]..地震小区划-理论与实践[C].北京:地震出版社,1989.141-153.
  • 10GBl7741—2005工程场地地震安全性评价[s].北京.中国标准出版社,2005.

二级参考文献14

  • 1祝龙根,杜坚.不同类型共振柱仪对比试验[J].大坝观测与土工测试,1990,14(3):26-32. 被引量:17
  • 2徐存森,吴俊璧.用扭转单剪/共振柱仪测定某核电站饱和原状砂的动剪切模量[J].大坝观测与土工测试,1996,20(5):36-39. 被引量:10
  • 3熊建国 许贻燕.分层土自振特性分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,1986,6(4):21-35.
  • 4《工程地质手册》编委会.工程地质手册[M].4版,北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2006.
  • 5薛素铎,赵均,高向宇.建筑抗震设计[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2007.
  • 6MOTAZEDIAN D, BANAB K K, HUNTER J A, et al. Comparison of site period derived from different evaluation methods[J]. BSSA, 2011, 101(6): 2942 - 2954.
  • 7DOBRY R, OWEIS I, URZUR A. Simplified procedures for estimation the fundamental period of a soil profile[J]. BSSA, 1976(4): 1293 - 1321.
  • 8IDRISS I M, SEED H B. Seismic response of horizontal soil layers[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 1968, 94(4): 1003 - 1034.
  • 9中国地震局工程力学研究所.西安市阎良区地震小区划工作报告[R].西安:中国地震局工程力学研究所,2007.
  • 10王锺琦等.地震区工程选址手册[M]中国建筑工业出版社,1994.

共引文献1274

同被引文献59

引证文献7

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部