期刊文献+

Bethesda分类联合甲状腺超声影像报告与数据系统(TIRADS)对甲状腺结节恶性风险的评估价值 被引量:12

Value of Bethesda classfication combined with TIRADS in assessing the malignat risk of thyroid nodules
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价Bethesda系统联合甲状腺超声影像报告与数据系统(TIRADS)对甲状腺结节恶性风险的评估价值。方法回顾性分析经TIRADS分类并行超声引导细针穿刺细胞学检查(US-FNAC)的243例患者273个甲状腺结节资料,将其超声分类及Bethesda分类与组织病理学结果对照,统计Bethesda分类独立诊断和联合TIRADS诊断的敏感性、特异性。结果Bethesda分类独立诊断的敏感性为91.0%、特异性为90.3%;FNAC未定性类别中,BethesdaⅠ、Ⅲ类恶性率38.7%,BethesdaⅣ、Ⅴ类恶性率85.4%。联合TIRADS,阳性结果的敏感性为82.4%、特异性为100%,阴性结果的敏感性为99.5%、特异性为83.8%;FNAC未定性类别中,BethesdaⅠ/Ⅲ类且TIRADS2/3a类、BethesdaⅠ/Ⅲ类且TIRADS3b/3c/4、BethesdaⅣ/Ⅴ类且TIRADS2/3a、BethesdaⅣ/Ⅴ类且TIRADS3b/3c/4类恶性率分别为3.7%、81.8%、45.4%、100%。结论Bethesda分类联合TIRADS有助于甲状腺结节的术前诊断,减少部分不必要的重复细针穿刺和过度手术治疗。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of Bethesda system combined with thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) in assessing the malignat risk of thyroid nodules. Methods Histopathological, cytological and ultrasound (US) data were studied retrospectively for 243 cases after surgery,including 273 thyroid nodules. All thyroid cytopathological slides and US reports were classified according to Bethesda system and TIRADS. Based on histopathological comparison, the sensitivity and specificity were determined for Bethesda category and Bethesda category combined with TIRADS. Results The sensitivity and specificity of Bethesda category were 91.0%and 90.3%, respectively. In indeterminate nodules, malignancy rate was 38.7% in Bethesda categories Ⅰ and Ⅲ , and 85.4% in Bethesda categories Ⅳ and Ⅴ. In contrast, combined with TIRADS, the sensitivity and specificity of positive results were 82.4%, 100%, and negative results were 99.5%, 83.8%, respectively. The malignancy rate of TIRADS 2/3a in Bethesda categories Ⅰ/Ⅲ, TIRADS 3b/3c/4 in Bethesda categoriesⅠ/Ⅲ, TIRADS 2/3a in Bethesda categories Ⅳ/Ⅴ, and TIRADS 3b/3c/4 in Bethesda categories Ⅳ/Ⅴ were 3.7%, 81.8%, 45.4% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions Bethesda system combined with TIRADS may be helpful to the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules, which may reduce unnecessary repeat fine needle aspiration and excessive surgery.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期710-714,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 福建省科技重点项目(2014Y0026)
关键词 超声检查 活组织检查 细针 甲状腺疾病 Bethesda报告系统 甲状腺超声影像报 告与数据系统 Ultrasonography Biopsy, fine-needle Thyroid diseases Bethesda system Thyroid imaging reporting and data system
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1李玉姝,单忠艳.细针穿刺抽吸活检在甲状腺结节评估中的应用及进展[J].国际外科学杂志,2014,41(2):79-81. 被引量:11
  • 2Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK, et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics predictive of nondiagnostic results for fine-needle aspiration biopsies of thyroid nodules [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011,37(4) : 549-555. DOi: 10. 1016/j. ultrasmedbio. 2011.01. 0l 5.
  • 3Moon HJ, Kim EK, Yoon JH, et al. Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic results at cytologic examination:combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the Bethesda System [J]. Radiology, 2015, 274 (1): 287-295, DOI : 10.1148/radiol. 14140359.
  • 4Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2009,19 ( 11 ) : 1167-1214, DOI: 10. 1089/thy. 2009.0110.
  • 5刘静静,刘利平.甲状腺癌的超声诊断及新技术的临床应用进展[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2015,24(2):181-183. 被引量:7
  • 6杨斌,薛德彬,主译.甲状腺细胞病理学Bethesda报告系统:定义、标准和注释[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,2010:6.
  • 7Moon HJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY. Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with benign results on cytology: combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and Bethesda system [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2/)14, 21 (6) : 1898-191)3. DOI: 10. 1245/ s10434-014-3556-2.
  • 8Lee SW, Lee HJ, Kim H J, et al. Combined categorical reporting systems of US and cytology findings for thyroid nodules: guidance on repeat fine-needle aspiration cytology[J]. Radiology, 2013,266(3) :956-963. DOI: 10.1148/radiol. 12112710.
  • 9Moon HJ, Kim EK, Yoon JH, et al. Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic results at cytologic examination:combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the Bethesda System [J]. Radiology, 2015, 274 ( 1 ) : 287-295. DOI: 10.1148/radiol. 14140359.
  • 10Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R, et al. An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management [J]. J Clin Endoerinol Metah, 2(109, 94 ( 5 ) : 1748- 1751. DOI: 10. 1210/jc. 2008-1724.

二级参考文献40

  • 1罗葆明,欧冰,冯霞,周敏,文艳玲.乳腺疾病实时组织弹性成像与病理对照的初步探讨[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(9):662-664. 被引量:207
  • 2Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer [ J ]. Thyroid, 2009, 19 (11): 1167-1214.
  • 3All SZ, Cibas ES. The bethesda system for reporting thyroid cyto- pathology: definitions, criteria and explanatopy notes [ M ]. New York: Springer, 2010: 1-166.
  • 4Cesur M, Corapcioglu D, Bulut S, et al. Comparison of palpation- guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy to ultrasound-guided fine-nee- die aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of thyroid nodules[J]. Thy-roid, 2006, 16(6) : 555-561.
  • 5Li QK, Nugent SL, Straseski J, et al. Thyroglobulin measurement in fine-needle aspiration cytology of lymph nodes for the dectection of metastatic papilly thyroid carcinoma [ J ]. Cancer Cytopathol, 2013, 121(8) : 440-448.
  • 6Rossi ED, Raffaelli MD, Zannoni GF, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of conventional as compared to liquid-based cytology in thyroid le- sions evaluation of 10,360 fine needle aspiration cytology cases [J]. Acta Cytol, 2009, 53(6) : 659-666.
  • 7Xing M, Haugen BR, Schlumberger M. Progress in molecular- based management of differentiated thyroid cancer [ J ]. Lancet,2013, 38l(9871) : 1058-1069.
  • 8Nikiforov YE. Molecular analysis of thyroid tumors [ J 1. Mod Pathol, 2011, (Suppl 2) : S34-43.
  • 9Alexander EK, Kennedy GC, Baloeh ZW, et al. Preoperative di- agnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(8) : 705-715.
  • 10Li H, Robinson KA, Anton B, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a novel molecular test for cytologically indeterminatethyroid nodules [ J 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2011, 96 ( 11 ) : E1719-1726.

共引文献19

同被引文献77

引证文献12

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部