期刊文献+

声诺维联合超声辐照介导PEX基因转染鼠胶质瘤C6细胞的实验研究 被引量:1

Experimental study of PEX gene transfection into rat C6 glioma cells mediated by SonoVue combined with ultrasonic irradiation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨声诺维联合超声辐照介导pEGFP-C1-PEX转染鼠胶质瘤C6细胞的可行性,以及PEX基因对鼠胶质瘤C6的细胞影响。方法将体外培养的细胞分为空白对照组、超声+微泡组、质粒组、质粒+微泡组、质粒+超声组、质粒+超声+微泡组。分别处理后继续培养24h,应用荧光显微镜评估细胞转染率,RT—PCR检测PEXmRNA表达,流式细胞仪分析细胞周期。结果质粒+超声+微泡组基因转染率最高,可见特异性PEX电泳条带高表达,流式细胞仪分析细胞周期G0/G1期百分数明显升高为(75.09±2.46)%,S期百分数明显降低为(17.91±2.63)%,与其他组比较差异均有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。结论声诺维联合超声辐照可促进PEX基因在鼠胶质瘤C6细胞中的转染;在体外PEX基因可以通过影响细胞周期来抑制鼠胶质瘤C6细胞的增殖。 Objective To investigate the feasibility of pEGFP-C1-PEX transfection into rat C6 glioma cells mediated by SonoVue combined with ultrasonic irradiation, and observe the effect of PEX gene on C6 glioma cells. Methods The C6 cells were cultured in vitro and divided into 6 groups: control group, ultrasound + microbubbles group, plasmid + microbubbles group, plasmid + ultrasound group, plasmid + ultrasound + microbubbles group. Twenty-four hours after appropriate treatment, the transfection efficiency was assessed by fluorescent microscopy, the mRNA expression of PEX was detected by RT-PCR, and the cell cycle change was assessed by flow cytometry. Results The transfection efficiency of PEX gene was highest, the specific PEX electrophoresis strips was seen, and the percentage of G0/G1 phase rised to (75.09 ± 2.46) %, S period cells decreased to ( 17.91 ± 2.63 ) % in plasmid + ultrasound + microbubbles group, compared with other groups, the differences were statistically significant (all P 〈0.05). Conclusions SonoVue and ultrasonic irradiation can enhance the transfection of PEX gene into rat C6 glioma cells;PEX gene can inhibit the proliferation of rat C6 glioma cells by affecting the cell cycle in vitro.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期727-730,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
关键词 超声检查 微气泡 神经胶质瘤 PEX基因 Ultrasonography Microbubbles Glioma PEX gene
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kunishio K, Okada M, Matsumoto Y, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and 9 expression in astrocytic tumors [J] Brain Tumor Pathol, 2003,20(2) :39-45.
  • 2Bello L, Lucini V, Carrabba G, et al. Simultaneous inhibition of glioma angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and invasion by a naturally occurring fragment of human metalloproteinase-2 [J]. Cancer Res, 2001,61 (24) :8730-8736.
  • 3Ohgaki H, Kleihues P. Epidemiology and etiology of gliomas[J]. Acta Neuropathol, 2005, 109(1 ):93-108. DOI: 10. 1007/s()0401- 005-0991-y.
  • 4Sirsi SR, Borden MA. Advances in ultrasound mediated gene therapy using microbubble contrast agents [J]. Theranosties, 2012,2(12) : 1208-1222. DOI : 10.7150/thno. 4306.
  • 5Carson AR, McTiernan CF, Lavery L, et al. Gene therapy of carcinoma using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011,37 (3) : 393-402. DOI: I 0.1016/ j. ultrasmedbio.2010.11.011.
  • 6Geis NA, Katus HA, Bekeredjian R. Microbubbles as a vehicle for gene and drug delivery: current clinical implications and future perspectives [J]. Curt Pharm Des, 2012, 18 (15) : 2166- 2183.
  • 7吴长君,王俊峰,邱前义,郑淼.超声联合声诺维辐照增强GFP基因在鼠胶质瘤C6细胞中的转染[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2010,19(5):443-445. 被引量:4
  • 8Reslan L, Mestas JL, Herveau S, et al. Transfeetion of cells in suspension by ultrasound cavitation [J]. J Control Release, 2010, 142(2) :251-258. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jconrel. 2009.10. 029.
  • 9Newman CM, Bettinger T. Gene therapy progress and prospects : ultrasound for gene transfer [J]. Gene Ther, 2007, 14 (6) : 465- 475. DOI: 10. 1038/sj. gt. 33(12925.
  • 10丁尚伟,张艳容,吴文谦,任萍萍,黄晓宇,张培歌,武彧,于艾嘉,谢明星,吕清.不同转染方式介导基因转染效果的评价[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2014,23(4):349-352. 被引量:4

二级参考文献15

  • 1Fang Nie,Hui-Xiong Xu,Qing Tang,Ming-De Lu.Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound exposure improves gene transfer in vascular endothelial cells[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(46):7508-7513. 被引量:21
  • 2陈云超,张青萍,LIANG Hai-dong,朱蔚,张超,Martin JK Blomley,LU Qi-long.超声和微泡造影剂介导细胞基因转染的实验研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(11):864-868. 被引量:22
  • 3Suzuki R, Oda Y, Utoguchi N, Maruyama K. Progress in the development of ultrasound-mediated gene delivery systems utilizing nano- and microbubbles [ J ]. J Control Release, 2011, 149:36-41.
  • 4Paproski RJ, Yao SY, Favis N, et at. Human concentrative nucleoside transporter 3 transfection with ultrasound and microbubhles in nucleoside transport deficient HEK293 cells greatly increases gemcitabine uptake [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8: e56423.
  • 5Mannell H,Pircher J,Fochler F,et al.Site directed vascular gene delivery in vivo by ultrasonic destruction of magnetic nanopartiele coated microbubbles[ J ]. Nanomedicine, 201 2, 8 : 1309-1318.
  • 6Chen S, Shohet RV, Bekeredjian R, et al. Optimization of ultrasound parameters for cardiac gene delivery of adenoviral or plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,42 : 301- 308.
  • 7Hernot S, Klihanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2008,60:1153- 1166.
  • 8Guo DP, Li XY, Sun P, et al. Ultrasound-targeted rnicrobubble destruction improves the low density lipoprotein receptor gene expression in HepG2 cells[J].Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2006,343 :470 -474.
  • 9Takahashi M, Kido K, Aoi A, et al. Spinal gene transfer using ultrasound and microbubbles [ J]. J Control Release, 2007, 117 .- 267-272.
  • 10Fan Z,Chen D,Deng CX.Improving ultrasound gene transfection efficiency by controlling ultrasound excitation of microbubbles[J].J Control Release, 2013,170 : 401-413.

共引文献6

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部