期刊文献+

超强预处理allo-HSCT联合GVL诱导策略治疗难治性急性淋巴细胞白血病74例 被引量:1

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for 74 patients with refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia following sequential intensified conditioning combined with graft-versns-leukemia induction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨超强预处理异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)联合移植物抗白血病(GVL)诱导策略治疗难治性未缓解急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的安全性和有效性。方法将2005年1月至2014年12月行allo-HSCT的74例难治性ALL患者纳入此研究。序贯超强预处理方案为氟达拉滨+阿糖胞苷+全身放疗+环磷酰胺十依托泊苷。GVL诱导策略包括:移植后第30天对未发生急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)者给予快速递减免疫抑制剂,至第60天未发生Ⅱ度或以上急性GVHD者给予供者淋巴细胞输注(DLI)。结果除2例在移植后1周内分别死于感染和预处理相关毒性外,其他受者均在粒系重建时获得完全缓解。预处理相关致死率为1.4%(1/74)。白血病的5年复发率为(29.2±6.1)%,5年非复发死亡率为(30.4±5.6)%,5年总存活率(OS)和无病存活率(DFS)为(49.5±5.9)%和(48.2±5.9)%。B淋巴细胞ALL和T淋巴细胞ALL患者的5年复发率、OS和DFS无显著差异(P=0.929、P=0.652和P=0.691)。DLI、慢性GVHD和移植0天骨髓幼稚细胞是移植后复发和生存的独立预后因素(P=0.043、P=0.026及P〈0.001;P=0.045、P=0.029及P〈0.001)。结论序贯超强预处理allo-HSCT联合GVL诱导策略能降低难治性ALL复发率和提高受者的存活率。 Objective To explore the safety and effectiveness of sequential intensified conditioning regimen combined with graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) induction in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for refractory advanced acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Methods A total of 74 patients with refractory ALL, undergoing allo-HSCT from Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2014, were enrolled in this study. Intensified conditioning was: fludarabine + cytarabine plus total body irradiation + cyclophosphamide + etoposide. Cyclosporine A was withdrawn rapidly in a stepwise fashion if patients did not experience acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) by day + 30 post-transplantation. Donor lymphocytes were infused in patients without grade II or more than grade II aGVHD by day + 60 post-transplantation. Results Except for one who died of infection and one who died of regimen-related toxicity (RRT), the remaining 72 patients achieved complete remission at the time of neutrophil reconstitution. The mortality of RRTs was 1.4% (1/74). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse post-transplantation was (29. 2 ± 6. 1)%. The 5-year non-relapse mortality was (30. 4 ±5.6) %. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival was(49. 5 ± 5.9)% and (48. 2 ±5. 9)^ respectively. The 5-year leukemia relapse rate, overall and disease-free survival were similar between patients with B-cell ALL and T-cell ALL (P = 0. 929, P = 0. 652, P = 0. 691). Multivariate analysis revealed that donor lymphocyte infusion, chronic GVHD and bone marrow blasts on day 0 were independent prognostic factors for relapse and survival (P = 0.043, P=0.026, P〈0.001; P=0.045, P=0.029, P〈0.001). Conclusion The strategy of sequential intensified conditioning combined with GVL induction could decrease the relapse rate and improve the survival for refractory ALL.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 2016年第5期257-262,共6页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
基金 国家自然科学基金(81270647,81300445,81470349,U1401221) 广东省自然科学基金(2014A030310171) 广东省科技计划项目(2014B020226004) 广州市健康医疗协同创新重大专项(201400000003-1,201400000003-4)
关键词 难治性急性淋巴细胞白血病 异基因造血干细胞移植 超强预处理 移植物抗白血病 Refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Intensified conditioning regimens Graft-versus-leukemia
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Kantarjian HM, O'Brien S, Smith TL, et al. Results of treatment with hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2000, 18 (3) :547-561.
  • 2Rowe JM, Buck G, Burnett AK, et al. Induction therapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of more than 1500 patients from the international ALL trial: MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993 [J ]. Blood, 2005, 106 ( 12 ) : 3760-3767. DOI: 10. 1182/blood-2005-04-1623.
  • 3Duval M, Klein JP, He W, et al. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for acute leukemia in relapse or primary induction failure[J].J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(23):3730-3738.
  • 4Mengarelli A, Iori A, Gnglielmi C, et al. Standard versus alternative myeloablative conditioning regimens in aUogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute leukemia[J].Haematolngica, 2002, 87(1):52-58.
  • 5AsehanJ. Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: conditioning [J].Best practice ~- research Clinical haematology, 2007, 20(2):295-310.
  • 6Liu QF, Fan ZP, Zhang Y, et al. Sequential intensified conditioning and tapering of prophylactic for graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietie stem cell transplantation for refractory leukemia[J].Biology of blood and marrow transplantation, 2009, 15 ( 11 ) : 1376-1385. DOI: 10. 1016/j. bbmt. 2009. 06. 017.
  • 7Dharnidharka VR, Araya CE. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease[J]. Pediatric nephrolngy (Berlin, Germany), 2009, 24 (4): 731-736.
  • 8Bacher U, Schnittger S, Haferlach C, et al. Molecular diagnostics in acute leukemias [J]. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine', 2009, 47 (11): 1333-1341. DOI: 10. 1515/CCLM. 2009. 324.
  • 9Mrozek K, Heerema NA, Bloomfield CD. Cytogenetics in acute leukemia[J]. Blood reviews, 2004, 18 (2): 115-136. DOI: 10. 1016/S0268-960X(03)00040-7.
  • 10Bearman SI, Appelbaum FR, Buckner CD, et al. Regimen- related toxicity in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation[J]. Journal of clinical oncolngy, 1988, 6(10) : 1562-1568.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Vitale A, Guarini A, Ariola C, et al. Adult T-cell acute lympho- blastic leukemia: biologic profile at presentation and correlation with response to induction treatment in patients enrolled in the GIMEMA LAL 0496 protocol. Blood, 2006; 107(2) :473 -479.
  • 2Ferrando AA, Neuberg DS, Dodge RK, et al. Prognostic importance of TLX1 (HOX11 ) oncogene expression in adults with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Lancet, 2004 ; 363 (9408) :535 - 536.
  • 3Baak U, Gkbuget N, Orawa H, et al. Thymic adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia stratified in standard- and high-risk group by aberrant HOX11 L2 expression: experience of the German multicenter ALL study group. Leukemia, 2008 ; 22 (6) : 1154 - 1160.
  • 4Baldus CD, Burmeister T, Martus P, et al. High expression of 'the ETS transcription factor ERC predicts adverse outcome in acute T- lymphoblastie leukemia in adults. J Clin Oneol, 2006 ; 24 ( 29 ) : 4714 - 4720.
  • 5Czuczma MS, Dodge RK, Stewart CC, et al. Value of Imnmnophe- notype in Intensively Treated Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 8364. Blood, 1999; 93 (l I ) : 3931 - 3939.
  • 6Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetic of Tumors of Haema- topoietic and Lymphoid Tissue. Lyon: IARC Press, 2001 : 75, 109, 181.
  • 7ISCN( 1995): An International System for Human Cytogenetic No- menclature, edited by Mitelman, S. Karger AG, Basel, 1995.
  • 8Kantarjian H, Thomas D, OBrien S, et al. Long-term follow-up re- sults of hyperfraetionated cyclophosphamide vineristine, doxorubicin, and dexaulethasone ( Hyper-CVAD ), a dose-intensive regimen, in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer, 2004; 101 (12) :2788 - 2801.
  • 9Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, et al. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first comp|ete remission, and an autologous transp|antation is less effective than conventional consolidatiot/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the International ALL Tial (MRC UKALLXII/ECOG E2993 ). Blood, 2008 ; 111 (4) : 1827 -- 1833.
  • 10Spinelli O, Peruta B, Tosi M, et al. Clearance of minimal tsidual disease ter allogeneic stem cell transplantation and the pdiclii of the clinical outcome of adult patients with high-risk acute lympho- blastic leukemia. Haematologica, 2007 ; 92 ( 5 ) :612 - 618.

共引文献6

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部