期刊文献+

我国制造业出口企业产品种类对企业加成率的影响研究 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 加成定价是衡量市场竞争和企业绩效的重要内容,但国内外一直缺乏有效的估算方法。本文借鉴Loecker&Warzynski(2012)对加成率估算提出的改进方法,基于2000-2006年中国工业企业数据库和海关进出口数据库匹配结果,证实了我国出口产品种类与企业的加成定价能力成负向关系,企业的过度产品种类导致出口行为的扭曲,出口企业加成率非常低。在此基础上,本文提出中国出口企业应该注重开发自身的核心产品、拳头产品,提高企业的核心竞争力。本文还发现企业生产率的提高可以显著提高加成定价能力,高生产率企业通过市场竞争效应能够获得更大的海外市场;补贴对不同所有制企业、进入、退出和连续存活的企业有显著的差异性影响。
出处 《经济问题探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期101-109,共9页 Inquiry Into Economic Issues
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"负面清单管理模式下服务业开放路径与政府策略选择研究"(15CJY062) 项目负责人:余颖丰
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Amiti M, Freund C. The anatomy of Chinag ex- port growth[M]. China~ growing role in world trade. Uni- versity of Chicago Press, 2010 : 35 - 56.
  • 2Bernard A B, Jensen J B, Redding S J, et al. The empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade [R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011.
  • 3De Loecker J, Warzynski F M P. Markups and Exporting Behavior [J]. American Economic Review, 2012.
  • 4Eichengreen B, Rhee Y, Tong H. China and the exports of other Asian countries [J]. Review of WorldEconomics, 2007,143 (2) :201 - 226.
  • 5Forlani E. Competition in the service sector and the performances of manufacturing finns: Does liberaliza- tion matter? [M]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2010.
  • 6Hall R E, Blanchard O J, Hubbard R G. Mar- ket structure and c fluctuations [J]. Brook- ings papers on economic activity, 1986,1986 (2) : 285 - 338.
  • 7Krugman P. Scale economies, product differenti- ation, and the pattern of trade [J]. The American Eco- nomic Review, 1980,70 (5) :950 - 959.
  • 8Levisohn J, Petrin A. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservable [J]. Re- view of Economic Studies, 2003,70:317 - 341.
  • 9Mayer T, Melitz M J, Ottaviano G I. Market size, competition, and the product mix of exporters [R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011.
  • 10Melitz M J. The impact of trade on intra - in- dustry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity [J]. Econometrica, 2003,71 (6) : 1695 - 1725.

二级参考文献130

  • 1王永钦,张晏,章元,陈钊,陆铭.中国的大国发展道路——论分权式改革的得失[J].经济研究,2007,42(1):4-16. 被引量:762
  • 2Amerighi, O., and S. ,Peralta, 2010, "The Proximity-concentration Trade-off with Profit Shifting", Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 68, 90-101.
  • 3Barba Navaretti, G., A. J. , Venables, F. Barry, K. Ekholm, A. Falzoni , J. Haaland, K. -H. Midelfart, and A. Turrini. ,2004, Multinational Firms in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 4Baldwin, R. E. , and G. I. P. Ottaviano, 2001, "Multiproduct Multinationals and Reciprocal FDI Dumping" , Journal of International Economics, Vol. 54,429-448.
  • 5Barros, P. P. , and L. Cabral, 2000, "Competing for FDl", Review of International Economics, Vol. 8, 360-37l.
  • 6Behrens, K. , and P. M. Picard, 2008, "Bidding for Horizontal Multinationals" , Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 6,1244-1278.
  • 7Bernheim, B. D. , and M. D. Whinston, 1986, "Menu Auctions, Resource Allocation, and Economic Influence", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, 1-3l.
  • 8Bjorvatn , K. , and C. Eckel, 2006, "Policy Competition for Foreign Direct Investment Between Asymmetric Countries", European Economic Review, Vol. 50, 1891-1907.
  • 9Bucovetsky , S., 1991, "Asymmetric Tax Competition", Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 30,167-181.
  • 10Bucovetsky, S. , and A. Haufler, 2008, "Tax Competition When Firms Choose Their Organizational Form: Should Tax Loopholes for Multinationals Be Closed?" , Journal of International Economics, Vol. 74, 188-201.

共引文献7341

同被引文献52

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部