期刊文献+

策略转换的成本与顺序效应 被引量:2

Strategy switch cost and its sequence effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 灵活的策略转换是个体有效地解决问题的重要条件。策略转换需要成本已得到大量证明,但策略转换成本是否为对称转换成本尚无定论。基于已有研究,对策略转换中存在策略顺序困难效应与较差策略顺序调节效应两种典型的顺序效应进行了具体介绍。在此基础上提出了不对称策略转换成本可能是对称转换成本与策略顺序困难效应之和的假设,并进而提出设想:可通过操纵时间变量来分离策略顺序困难效应与较差策略顺序调节效应。此外,从策略转换成本的角度创新地阐释了策略选择的惰性与倒退现象。 Flexible strategy switch is an important condition for individuals to solve tasks effectively. It has been fully proved that strategy switch needs cost, but whether the strategy switch cost is symmetric or not remains uncertain. Based on existing research, we introduced two typical effects, strategy sequentialdifficult effects and sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects, then proposed a hypothesis that asymmetric strategy switch cost may be the sum of symmetry switch cost and strategy sequence difficulty effect, and further put forward the idea to separate strategy sequential difficult effects from sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects by manipulating time variable. In addition, it made a new explanation of the inertia and setback of strategy choice from the angle of strategy switch cost.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期1198-1206,共9页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 全国教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题:学习策略的生成与掌握研究(批准号DBA090293)
关键词 策略转换成本 策略顺序效应 策略顺序困难效应 较差策略顺序调节效应 strategy switch cost strategy sequence effect strategy sequential difficult effects sequential modulations of poorer-strategy effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

二级参考文献126

  • 1史艺荃,周晓林.执行控制研究的重要范式——任务切换[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):672-679. 被引量:21
  • 2李美华,白学军,沈德立.不同年级学生执行功能发展水平研究[J].心理科学,2006,29(3):609-613. 被引量:6
  • 3Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003, 7 (3) : 134-140.
  • 4Logan G D. Executive control of thought and action: In search of the wild homunculus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2003, 12 (2) : 45-48.
  • 5Jersild A T. Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology. 1927, 89:5-82.
  • 6Rogers R D, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1995, 124 (2) : 207-231.
  • 7Allprot D A, Styles E A, Hsieh S. Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks//Umilta C, Moscovith M. Attention and Performance, XV, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1994, 421-452.
  • 8Meiran N, Chorev Z, Sapir A. Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology. 2000, 41 (3) : 211-253.
  • 9Monsell S, Mizon G A. Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2006, 32 (3) : 493-516.
  • 10Poulsen C, Luu P, Davey C, et al. Dynamics of task sets: Evidence from dense-array event-related potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 2005, 24 (1) : 133-154.

共引文献43

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部