期刊文献+

卵巢低储备患者改良超长方案与微刺激方案助孕结局比较 被引量:3

Comparison of assisted reproduction technology results of modified ultra- long protocol and minimal stimulation protocol among patients with diminished ovarian reserve
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过分析卵巢储备功能下降(DOR)患者应用改良超长及微刺激方案促排卵的治疗结局,为DOR患者寻找一种最佳的治疗方案。方法回顾性分析2011年11月-2015年12月厦门市妇幼保健院采取改良超长及微刺激方案行IVF/ICSI助孕的DOR患者202例。根据治疗方案将患者分为两组:第1组(改良超长方案组)107例,第2组(微刺激方案组)95例。比较两组患者的治疗结局。结果两组患者年龄、不孕年限、BMI、基础FSH、AFC比较,差异无统计意义(P>0.05)。但改良超长方案组Gn用量、Gn天数、获卵数、可用胚数、优胚数、临床妊娠率、着床率显著高于微刺激方案组(P<0.05)。结论对于卵巢储备功能下降的患者,采用改良超长方案助孕可以获得较好的临床妊娠率,是值得推荐的一种治疗方案。 Objective To find the best protocol for women with diminished ovarian reserve by analyzing the assisted reproduction technology (ART) results of modified ultra-long protocol and minimal stimulation protocol among patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) . Methods A total of 202 patients with DOR treated by IVF/ICSI through modified ultra-long protocol and minimal stimulation protocol respectively in the hospital from November 2011 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively, then the patients were divided into modified ultra-long protocol group (107 patients) and minimal stimulation protocol group (95 patients) according to treatment protocol. The treatment results in the two groups were compared. Results There was no statistically significant difference in age, duration of infertility, BMI, basic FSH, and AFC between the two groups (P〉0. 05) . The dose and application time of gonadotropin (Gn), the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of available embryos, the number of good quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate, and implantation rate in modified ultra-long protocol group were statistically significantly higher than those in minimal stimulation protocol group (P〈0. 05) . Conclusion For the patients with diminished ovarian reserve, modified ultra-long protocol can obtain high clinical pregnancy rate, which is worthy of recommendation.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 2016年第17期3574-3576,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 福建省科技计划项目(2015D018) 福建省卫生计生委青年科研课题(2015-2-52)
关键词 卵巢低储备 改良超长方案 微刺激方案 助孕 Diminished ovarian reserve Modified ultra-long protocol Minimal stimulation protocol Assisted reproduction technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, et al. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertili- zation a systematic review and meta- analysis [ J ]. Fertil Steril, 2009, 91 (3) : 749-766.
  • 2Butts SF, Owen C, Mainigi M, et al. Assisted hatching and intraeyto- plasmie sperm injection are not associated with improved outcomes in assisted reproduction cycles for diminished ovarian reserve: an analy- sis of cycles in the United States from 2004 to 2011 [J]. Fertil Ster- il, 2014, 102 (4) : 1041-1047.
  • 3徐千花,曹云霞,魏兆莲,丛林,章志国.不同促排卵方法在卵巢储备功能下降患者中的应用[J].生殖与避孕,2009,29(1):51-54. 被引量:28
  • 4Schimberni M, Morgia F, Colabianchi J, et al. Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients : a survey of 500 consecutive cy- cles [J]. Fertil Steril, 2009, 92 (4) : 1297-1301.
  • 5Li J, Xu Y, Zhou G, et al. Natural cycle IVF/IVM may" be more de- sirable for poor responder patients after failure of stimulated cycles [J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2011,28 (9) : 791-795.
  • 6Yoo JH, Cha SH, Park CW, et al. Comparison of mild ovarian stimu- lation with conventional ovarian stimulation in poor responders [ J]. Clin Exp Reprod Med, 2011, 38 (3) : 159-163.
  • 7Oudendijk .IF, Yarde F, Eijkemans MJ, et al. The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor. A systematic review [ J ]. Hum Reprod Update, 2012, 18 (1) : 1-11.
  • 8江成龙,叶艳琴,胡冬玲,彭海英,张昌军.比较GnRH拮抗剂与GnRHa短方案在卵巢低反应患者超促排卵中的应用[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2009,17(11):107-108. 被引量:8
  • 9耿嘉瑄,张少娣,张翠莲,梁琳琳.不同促排卵方案在卵巢低反应患者中的应用[J].生殖与避孕,2010,30(12):837-840. 被引量:25
  • 10Tu J, Lin G, Lu CF, et al. A novel modified ultra-long agonist pro- tocol improves the outcome of high body mass index women with polycystic overy syndrome undergoing IVF/ICSI [J]. Gynecol En- doerinol, 2014, 30 (3) : 1473-1766.

二级参考文献22

  • 1徐千花,曹云霞,魏兆莲,丛林,章志国.不同促排卵方法在卵巢储备功能下降患者中的应用[J].生殖与避孕,2009,29(1):51-54. 被引量:28
  • 2朱小明,蔡婕,黄荷凤.卵巢低反应的诊断标准和预测[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2006,22(5):388-390. 被引量:50
  • 3甄秀梅,乔杰,李蓉,陈新娜,刘平.体外受精-胚胎移植309个卵巢反应不良周期临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2007,8(2):113-116. 被引量:13
  • 4刘嘉茵.微刺激方案治疗卵巢低反应IVF周期[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(3):134-135. 被引量:20
  • 5Griesinger G, et al. GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation ; a treatment regimen of clinicians' second choice.'? Data from the German national IVF registry[J]. Hum Reprod,2005,20(9), 2373 -2375.
  • 6Akman MA ,et al. Addition of GnRH antagonist in cycles of poor responders undergoing IVF [ J ]. Human Reproduction,2000,15:2145.
  • 7Veeck LL. Oocyte assessment and biological performance [ J ]. Ann NY Acad Sci,1988,541:259 -74.
  • 8Mohamed KA, Davies WA, Allsopp J, et al. Agonist ' flare - up' versus antagonist in the management of poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment[ J]. Fertil Steril,2005 ,83 :331 - 335.
  • 9De Placido G, Mollo A, Clarizia R, et al. Gonadotropin - releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist plus recombinant luteinizing hormone vs. a standard GnRH agonist short protocol in patients at risk for poor ovarian response[ J]. Fertil Steril,2006,85:247 - 250.
  • 10Malmusi S, La Marca A, Giulini S, et al. Comparison of a gonadotropin - releasing hormone ( GnRH ) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare -up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation [ J]. Fertil Steril,2005 ,84 :402 -406.

共引文献64

同被引文献21

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部