期刊文献+

温州市血液透析室护士批判性思维能力现况调查 被引量:9

Investigation of critical thinking ability of nurses in Department of Hemodialysis in Wenzhou cityInvestigation of critical thinking ability of nurses in Department of Hemodialysis in Wenzhou city
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:调查温州市医院血透室护士批判性思维能力的现状及特征,为临床血透室护士批判性思维能力的培养提供科学依据。方法采用批判性思维能力测量表( CTDI-CV)对温州地区7所三级甲等医院、2所二级乙等医院共127名血透室护士批判性思维能力的现状及特征进行问卷调查。结果127名护士7个维度中寻求真相和批判性思维的自信心得分低于40分,其他5个维度的得分均大于40分,护士的批判性思维总分(295.65±25.35)分。不同学历的护士批判性思维能力7个特质及总分差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论血透室护士整体批判性思维能力呈正性水平,寻求真相、批判性思维自信心有待提高。 Objective To investigate the current situation of nursers′ critical thinking ability in Department of Hemodialysis in Wenzhou, so as to provide scientific basis for cultivating critical thinking ability of nurses in Department of Hemodialysis. Methods A total of of 127 nurses from 7 level three and class A hospitals and level two and class B hospitals in Wenzhou were investigated for current situation and characteristics of critical thinking ability with questionnaires, critical thinking disposition inventory-Chinese version ( CTDI-CV) . Results Among 127 nurses, scores of confidence to seek for the truth and of critical thinking were less than 40, and the scores of other dimensions were more than 40 in seven dimensions along with (295. 65 ± 25. 35) for the total score of critical thinking ability. There were significant differences in 7 traits and total scores of critical thinking ability among nurses with different educational background (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusions The overall level of critical thinking ability of nurses in Department of Hemodialysis is positive. At the same time, confidence to seek for the truth and critical thinking need to be improved.
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2016年第8期1110-1112,共3页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
基金 温州市2014年公益性科技计划项目课题(Y20140643)
关键词 护士 肾透析 批判性思维 问卷调查 Nurse Renal dialysis Critical thinking Questionnaire survey
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1殷磊.护理学基础[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:216
  • 2MottolaCA,MuRphyP.AntiDoteDileMMa-anaCtivitytopRoMoteCritiCalthinking[J].JContinEDuCNuRS,2001,32(4):161-164.
  • 3OMSteinAC,ThoMaSJL.StRategieSfoReffeCtiveteaChing[M].3RDeD.BoSton:MCGRawHill,2010:152-157.
  • 4彭美慈,汪国成,陈基乐,陈满辉,白洪海,李守国,李继平,蔡芸芳,王君俏,殷磊.批判性思维能力测量表的信效度测试研究[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(9):644-647. 被引量:1775
  • 5SCheffeRBK,RubenfelDMG.AConSenSuSStateMentonCritiCalthinkinginnuRSing[J].JNuRSEDuC,2000,39(8):352-359.
  • 6FeRoLJ,WitSbergeRCM,WeSMilleRSW,etal.CritiCalthinkingabilityofnewgRaDuateanDexperienCeDnuRSeS[J].JADvNuRS,2009,65(1):139-148.DOI:10.1111/J.1365-2648.2008.04834.x.
  • 7SMithB,JohnStonY.USingStRuCtuReDCliniCalpRepaRationtoStiMulateRefleCtionanDfoSteRCritiCalthinking[J].JNuRSEDuC,2002,41(4):182-185.DOI:10.3928/0148-4834-20020401-09.
  • 8OeRMannMH.EvaluatingCritiCalthinkinginCliniCalpRaCtiCe[J].NuRSeEDuC,1997,22(5):25-28.DOI:10.1097/00006223-199709000-00011.
  • 9符丽燕,朱念琼,唐莹.不同学历护士评判性思维能力的调查分析[J].中华护理教育,2008,5(2):88-90. 被引量:26
  • 10MartinC.ThetheoRyofCritiCalthinkingofnuRSing[J].NuRSEDuCPeRSpeCt,2002,23(5):243-247.

二级参考文献22

共引文献1829

同被引文献75

引证文献9

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部