期刊文献+

医疗建筑设计方案如何理性择优——英国医疗建筑设计质量评价工具引介与启示 被引量:1

HOW TO EVALUATE A DESIGN FOR HEALTHCARE BUILDING RATIONALLY:INTRODUCTION AND INSPIRATIONS OF BRITISH EVALUATION TOOLS FOR DESIGNS OF HEALTHCARE BUILDINGS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于医院建筑的复杂性和医疗工艺的专业性,对于建设决策团队中的非专业者和无医院项目经验的专业者而言,医院建筑设计的优劣常常难于精准评判;而医疗建筑先进设计理念因专业性强难以广泛传播与应用,这非常不利于医院建设。鉴于当前医疗建设投资规模巨大,亟须开展面向医疗建设各方人士的设计评价研究。本文基于调研,从国内需求出发,介绍英国若干主要医疗建筑设计质量评价工具,并分析其发展的社会机制。 Due to complexity of a hospital, both for non-professionals (such as decision-makers of hospital construction) and professionals (especially ones without hospital project experience), it is difficult to tell accurately which hospital design is better. At the same time, because advanced ideas of hospital design are difficult for non-professionals to understand, they have not been applied broadly. That situation has inevitably negative impact on our hospital construction. Thus, researches for evaluation of healthcare building design need to be on the agenda to match the investment scale of our hospital construction. Based on results of local surveys, the essay introduces several major evaluation tools for healthcare building design developed by UK. and explores mechanism behind their successful practice.
作者 郝晓赛
出处 《城市建筑》 2016年第19期30-35,共6页 Urbanism and Architecture
基金 北京建筑大学科学研究基金资助(编号:00331616001)
关键词 医疗建筑 建筑设计 设计评价 医院建设 Healthcare building, Building design, Design evaluation, Hospital construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1THOMPSON J D, GOLDIN G. The Hospital: A Social and Architectura History[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.
  • 2TAYLOR J. Hospital and Asylum Architecture in England 1850-1914 Building for Health Care[M]. London: Mansell Publishing, 1991.
  • 3郝晓赛.荷兰医疗建筑观察与解读[J].建筑学报,2012(2):68-73. 被引量:11
  • 4National Health Service Estates. Better by Design: Pursuit of Excel- lence in Healthcare Buildings[M], London: Stationery Office Books, 1994.
  • 5陈艳霞,程哲.英国医院政企合作开发模式研究及启示[J].中国医院建筑与装备,2014,15(3):87-92. 被引量:7
  • 6FRANCIS S, GLANVILLE R, TRUST N. Building a 2020 Vision: Future Health Care Environments[M]. London: Stationery Office Books, 2001.
  • 7BAYAZIT N. Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research[J]. Design Issues, 2004(1): 17.

二级参考文献9

  • 1巴特.洛茨玛,尹一木.荷兰建筑的第二次现代化[J].世界建筑,2005(7):28-32. 被引量:8
  • 2Mens N,Wagenaan C.Healthcare architecture in the Netherlands[M].Netherlands:Rotterdam,2010:7,9,227,230,278,281,331.
  • 3Susan Francis,Rosemary Glanville,Nuffield Trust.Building a 2020 vision:Future health care environments[M],London,2001:13.
  • 4Hofstede.G.Culture’s consequences:comparing values,behaviors,institutions and organizations across nations[M].2nd edition,Sage Publications:Thousand Oaks CA,2001.
  • 5Netherlands Board for Healthcare Institutions.Building Differentiation of Hospitals,Layers approach,2007:6,http://www.bouwcollege.nl/Bouwcolege_English/Planning_and_Quality/Cure/073609_building_web.pdf.
  • 6Netherlands Board for Healthcare Institutions,In 2025 healthcare facilities will be small-scale,http://www.bouwcollege.nl/smartsite.shtml?id=6963.
  • 7HM Treasu~. UK Private Finance Initiative Proj~t~: Summary data as at March 2012. [EB/OL]. ( 2012 ) [2013-10-16].
  • 8House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts.PFI in Housing and Hospitals (Fourteenth Report of Session 2010 - 11). [M]London: The Stationery Office lfimited.2011.
  • 9Ed Farquha~on ,Javier Encinas. The U.K. Treasury lnfrastntcture Finance Unit: Supporting PPP Financing During the Global Liquidity Crisis. [EB/OL]. (2010) [2013- ! 0-02].

共引文献16

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部