期刊文献+

碳排放权初始分配中防范企业逆向选择的演化博弈 被引量:6

Evolutionary Game Analysis to Prevent Enterprise Adverse Selection in the Initial Allocation of Carbon Emission Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在碳排放权初始配额的免费分配过程中,企业逆向选择会导致政府配额分配过量进而影响减排效果和环境治理,针对这一问题,以"复制动态方程"和"演化稳定策略"为建模基础,构建政府和企业间的演化博弈模型来研究博弈双方和系统的演化稳定策略,并通过仿真模拟分析相关参数对演化路径的影响。结果显示:当政府对谎报企业的罚金小于其监管成本时,博弈存在演化稳定策略,即企业谎报碳排放量且政府不监管。为避免出现这种企业逆向选择却不受监管的不利局面,政府应积极运用各种手段降低监管成本,加大对谎报企业的惩处力度,同时加强与企业的沟通,从而实现碳排放权初始配额的合理分配。 The overdose allocation of government carbon emission rights quota caused by enterprise adverse selection in the free allocation of carbon emission rights initial quota has negatively affected the reduction effect and environmental governance. For this question, this paper builds an evolutionary game model between the governments and the enterprises based on the "Replicator Dynamics Equation" and the "Evolutionary Stable Strategy" to study the evolutionary stable strategy of the game and the system, and to analyze the influence of related parameters on the evolution path through the simulation. The results show that when the fine that the government gets from a lying enterprise is less than its regulatory cost, the evolutionary game has a evolutionary stable strategy in which the enterprise lies to the government about carbon emissions and the government doesn't supervise the enterprise. To avoid such unfavorable situation in which adverse selection is unregulated, the government should actively use various means to reduce regulatory costs and increase the intensity of punishment for enterprises that lie about carbon emissions, while strengthening communication with enterprises, so as to realize the reasonable distribution of the carbon emission rights initial quota.
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2016年第4期28-35,共8页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(11BJY051)
关键词 碳排放权初始分配 逆向选择 演化博弈 the initial allocation of carbon emission rights adverse selection evolutionary game
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1ZHANG Y J,WANG A,TAN W P. The impact of China's carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises[J]. Energy Policy, 2015,86 : 1 76-185.
  • 2李凯杰,曲如晓.碳排放交易体系初始排放权分配机制的研究进展[J].经济学动态,2012(6):130-138. 被引量:25
  • 3BOHR1NGER C,LANGE A. Economic implications of alter-native allocation schemes for emission allocations[J]. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics ,2005,107(3) :563-581.
  • 4STERNER T, MULLER A. Output and abatement effects of allocation readjustment in permit trade[J]. Climatic Change, 2008,86 ( 1 ) : 33-49.
  • 5TASCHINI L. Environmental economics and modeling marketable permits[J]. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets,2010,17 (4):325- 343.
  • 6CRAMTON P, KERR S. Tradable carbon permit auctions: how and why to auction not grandfather[J]. Energy Policy, 2002,30 (4):3 33-345.
  • 7GOEREE J K, PALMER K, HOLT C A, et al. An experimental study of auctions versus grandfathering to assign pollution permits [J]. Journal of the European Economic Association,2010,8(2-3) :514-525.
  • 8ELLERMAN A D,CONVERY F J,DE PERTHUIS C. Pricing carbon: the european union emissions trading scheme[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2010.
  • 9刘新宇.碳排放权初始分配方式如何选择?[J].环境经济,2013(12):30-34. 被引量:5
  • 10LOPOMO G, MARX L M, MCADAMS D, et al. Carbon allowance auction design : an assessment of options for the United States [J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2011,5 ( 1 ) : 25-43.

二级参考文献105

共引文献189

同被引文献70

引证文献6

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部