期刊文献+

T型触探测试软黏土不排水抗剪强度工程实践 被引量:5

Engineering practice of undrained shear strength determination of soft soil by T-bar penetration test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文介绍了T型触探的研究现状、测试原理及其技术优点。选取天津某沿海软土场地,进行了工程实践,与静力触探测试结果、十字板测试结果进行了对比。测试结果表明:T型触探测试曲线变化趋势与静力触探基本一致;数值与十字板峰值强度相当。当不排水抗剪强度小于40k Pa时,T型触探测试结果稍高于十字板峰值强度;当不排水抗剪强度大于40k Pa时,二者测试结果基本相同。T型触探不需要上覆压力修正,不需要经验参数,有精确解,能方便地得到软黏土不排水抗剪强度随深度的变化曲线,是一种较好的原位测试手段。 The study status, testing principle and technical advantages of T-bar penetration test is introduced. The test is carried out in a soft ground in Tianjin,and then comparing the test results with static cone penetration test and vane shear test. It is shown that the changing tendency of T-bar penetration test curves is consistent with that of static cone penetration test and van shear test; the both peak values are similar. When the undrained shear strength is less than 40 k Pa,T-bar test result is slightly higher than vane shear test; when it is greater than 40 k Pa,the two test results are almost identical. The T-bar penetration test is a kind of good in-situ test method with many advantages such as interpretation without overlying pressure correction,no experience parameters needed,exact solutions,the changing curve with depth obtained easily.
出处 《工程勘察》 2016年第9期17-21,35,共6页 Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying
关键词 T型触探 工程实践 十字板试验 静力触探 结果对比 T-bar penetration test engineering practice vane shear test static cone penetration test results comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1刘松玉,吴燕开.论我国静力触探技术 (CPT)现状与发展[J].岩土工程学报,2004,26(4):553-556. 被引量:140
  • 2岩土工程手册编写委员会.岩土工程手册[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1995..
  • 3LUNNE T, RANDOLPH M F, CHUNG S F, et al. Comparison of cone and T-bar factors in two onshore and one offshore clay sediments[C]//Proceedings of the First International Symposiums on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics. London: Taylor and Francis, 2005, 981 --989.
  • 4STEWART D P, RANDOLPH M F. T-bar penetration testing in soft clay[J]. Journal of Geoteehnieal Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1994, 120(12): 2230--2235.
  • 5EINAV I, RANDOLPH M F. Combining upper bound and strain path methods for evaluating penetration resistance[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2005, 63:1991--2016.
  • 6RANDOLPH M F, HOULSBY G T. The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil[J]. Geotechnique, 1984, 34(4): 613--623.
  • 7MARTIN C M, RANDOLPH M F. Upper bound analysis of lateral pile capacity in cohesive soil[J]. Geotechnique, 2006, 56(2): 141 -- 145.
  • 8RANDOLPH M F, ANDERSEN K H. Numerical analysis of T-bar penetration in soft clay[J]. International Journal of Geomcehanics, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2006, 6(6): 411 --420.
  • 9AL-KARNI AA, AL-SHAMRANI M A. Study of the effect of soil anisotropy on slope stability using method of slices[J]. Computers and Geoteehnics, 2000, 26: 83--103.
  • 10HIBBIT, KARLSON, SORRENSON. ABAQUS user's manual (Version 6.3)[M]. Pawtucket: [s. n.], 2002.

共引文献36

同被引文献17

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部