期刊文献+

三种腔镜手术治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较 被引量:6

Comparison of three kinds of endoscopic surgery for upper ureteral calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较三种腔镜手术方法治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效。方法对218例单侧嵌顿性输尿管上段结石分别应用微创经皮肾镜取石(MPCNL)、经尿道输尿管镜取石术(URL)、后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术(RLU)治疗,对比三种手术方式的安全性、有效性及手术并发症。结果 MPCNL 组、URL 组、RLU组一次碎石成功率依次分别为100.00%、85.19%、100.00%,平均手术时间分别为(76.35±16.20)min、(46.26±15.30)min、(89.20±19.60)min,血红蛋白下降数值分别为(22.24±8.63)g/L、(4.15±1.89)g/L、(10.68±4.55)g/L,术后1个月结石清除率分别为96.32%、79.59%、100.00%,住院天数分别为(8.56±2.13)d、(6.58±1.76)d、(9.79±2.14)d,差异均有统计学意义(t/χ^2=36.916、27.629,均 P <0.05)。结论MPCNL、RLU 治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石均安全、有效、并发症少,但推荐首选 MPCNL,部分病例可尝试URL。 Objective To compare the efficacy of three endoscopic surgery in impacted upper ureteral calculi treatment.Methods 218 patients with impacted upper ureteral calculi were treated with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL),transurethral ureteroscope lithotripsy(URL)and retroperitoneal laparoscopic urerolithotomy (RLU)respectively.The operation safety,efficacy and complication were compared in the three groups.Results In the MPCNL group,URL group,RLU group one success rate of lithotripsy were 100.00%,85.19%,100.00% respec-tively.The mean operative time were (76.35 ±16.20)min,(46.26 ±15.30)min,(89.20 ±19.60)min respectively. Decreased hemoglobin values were (22.24 ±8.63)g/L,(4.15 ±1.89)g/L,(10.68 ±4.55)g/L respectively.The stone -free rates of one month postoperation were 96.32%,79.59%,100.00%.Length of hospital stay were (8.56 ± 2.13)d,(6.58 ±1.76)d,(9.79 ±2.14)d,respectively,the differences were statistically significant(t/χ^2 =36.916, 27.629,all P 〈0.05).Conclusion MPCNL and URL for impacted upper ureteral calculi is safety and has good efficacy and less complications,but the MPCNL is recommended the first choice,some cases can try URL.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2016年第17期2626-2629,共4页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 输尿管结石症 输尿管镜检查 腹腔镜检查 Ureterolithiasis Ureteroscopy Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献40

  • 1李逊,雷鸣,袁坚,曾国华,单炽昌,郭彬,陈文忠,刘冠昭.微创经皮肾穿刺取石和经尿道输尿管镜碎石治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(7):388-390. 被引量:234
  • 2邓耀良.复杂性肾结石的外科治疗[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(2):81-84. 被引量:66
  • 3李维国,夏术阶,朱轶勇,孙晓文,凡杰,鲁军,唐孝达.输尿管结石三种治疗方法的比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(2):124-125. 被引量:94
  • 4Jackman S V, Doeimo S G, Cadeddu J A, et al. The mini-per technique:a less invasive alternative tO pereutaneous nephrolithotomy[J].World J Urol, 1998, 16: 371-374.
  • 5Lahme S, Bichler K H, Strohmaire W H, etal. M inimal-ly invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and ealy-ceal stones[J]. Eur Urol, 2001, 40 : 619- 624.
  • 6梁丽莉,郭应禄,汤慧娣,石声华.ESWL 治疗输尿管结石失败原因分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(5):273-274. 被引量:200
  • 7Nualyong C, Taweemonkongsap T. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureteric calculi. J Med Assoc Thai, 1999,82:1028--1033.
  • 8Gaur D D, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai M R, et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU Int, 2002,89 : 339-- 343.
  • 9Daniel J,Painter,Francis X,et al.New concept in the treatment of ureteral calculi[J].Curr Opin Urol,2001(11):373-378.
  • 10Kourambas J.Dose a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscoPY[J]?J Urol,2001(165):789-791.

共引文献507

同被引文献55

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部