期刊文献+

论“具体数额”作为定罪量刑标准的存废——兼评生产、销售伪劣产品罪的修正 被引量:2

Retention and Abolishment of “Specific Amount”as Sentencing Standard——Also Comment on the Amendment of the Crime of Producing or Selling Fake or Inferior Products
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "具体数额"在刑法设立之初,作为定罪量刑的标准之一,因其形式上的公平模样,尤其是在经济性犯罪中备受宠爱。随着社会的发展,"具体数额"却在当今司法格局中遭受非难:刑罚量的有限与数额无限之间的不对等、低量刑幅度的较少适用而沦为"僵尸条款";数额以外的定罪量刑情节无法"大展拳脚";价值的变动与数字的僵硬在实际危害程度的表达上失衡。构建"数额加情节"的复合判断标准是数额犯立法实践的已然选择与今后发展的必然方向。 At the beginning of the criminal law, "specific amount", as one of the standards for the conviction, was in favor especially in the economic crime because of its form of justice. With the development of society, the "specif- ic amount" is caught in difficulties in today' s judicial pattern: there is no balance between limited penalty and un- limited amount; the less application of lower sentencing range make itself a "zombie clause" ;the conviction and sentencing plots outside the amount can not be applied well; the change of the value and the stiffness of numbers have lost balance in the expression of the actual harm. Building the composite standard of "amount plus plot" has been carried out in legislation practice and it will be the inevitable direction for the future development.
作者 朱德安
出处 《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》 2016年第3期79-83,共5页 Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词 具体数额 量刑标准 生产 销售伪劣产品罪 speeific amount sentencing standards the crime of producing or selling fake or inferior products
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献70

共引文献84

同被引文献82

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部