国际商事仲裁中的“真实”及其实现路径——兼及塑造独立仲裁证据规则的思考

Road to the Truth in International Commercial Arbitration and Its Realization Path Thoughts on Shaping of Evidence Rules of Arbitration

国际商事仲裁中对案件事实的认定同样需要依赖一套证据规则的指引,但却并无义务严格遵守民事诉讼证据规则。在仲裁实务中对证据的运用上,存在不同的路径依赖,比较理想化的是当事人意思自治与仲裁权的综合运用,但现实更为可行的是充分利用证据示范文本的指引。在构建独立证据规则的过程中,立法者与仲裁规则制定者要平衡公平与效率的价值,并充分尊重仲裁庭的主导权。

It needs a set of rules of evidence when the tribunal tries to determine the facts in international commercial arbitration, but the tribunal does not have to observe the civil procedure rules of evidence. There are different roads to rely on in the practices to use the evidence in arbitration. A more idealized solution is to synthesize the party autonomy and the power to arbitrate, but a more practical solution is to make full use of the international model rules. When constructing a specialized rules of evidence for arbitration, the legis- lators need to balance the fairness and efficiency, and esteem the dominant power of the tribunal.