期刊文献+

国外教材评价:基本特征、发展趋势及启示 被引量:24

Evaluation of Foreign Teaching Materials:Basic Characteristics,Development Trends and Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国外教材评价以先进的评价理念、坚实的理论基础、科学的评价指标为基本特征,表现出评价主体涵盖范围逐步扩大、评价内容由注重文本分析到开始关注使用过程、评价方法由重视理论思辨到注重实证研究、评价工具越来越重视指标体系的构建和应用等发展趋势。应该从以下方面改进我国教材评价工作:理念先行,以先进的理念指导教材评价实践;理论支撑,夯实教材评价的基本理论和方法论基础;具体可操作,构建科学有效的教材评价指标体系。 Evaluation of foreign teaching materials, which is based on advanced concepts, solid theories and scientific indicators, shows that the evaluation subject covers a gradually expanded range, the evaluation content is focused on the using process, the evaluation methodology pays more attention to empirical evidence, and the evaluation method gets more emphasis on the construct and use of evaluation indicators. We should improve our country's evaluation work of teaching materials from the following aspects: to use advanced ideas to guide evaluation practice; to provide theoretical support for strengthening the theoretical basis of the textbook evaluation; and to build a scientific and effective evaluation index system of teaehin^r rn^t~ri^l~ o, ~1~ :^-_1 1___ ,
作者 王晓丽
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期107-113,共7页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基金 首都师范大学首都教育发展协同创新中心2014年度重点课题"中国基础教育教材多样化政策实施效能与发展取向研究"
关键词 国外 教材评价 评价指标 启示 abroad evaluation of teaching materials~ evaluation indicators~ enlightenment
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1FAN L, ZHU Y. Repesentation of Problom-solving Procedures: A Comparative Look at China, Sigapore, and US Mathematics Textbooks [J]. Eduation Study in Mathematics, 2007, 66 (1)61-75.
  • 2MCCUTCHEON B. Elementary School Teachers' Planning for Social Studies and Other Subjects [J]. Theory and Research in Social Education, 1981, 9 (1) : 45-66.
  • 3KOMOSKI P. Instructional Material Will not Improve until We Change the System[J]. Educational Leader- ship, 1985, 42.. 31-37.
  • 4RUDBY R. Selection of Materials [A]. Timlinson, B. Developing Materials for Language Teaching [C]. London: Continuum, 2003: 37-57.
  • 5DAOUD A, CELCE-MURCIA M. Selecting and Evaluating a Textbook [C] // CELE-MURCIA M, MCINTOSH L. Teaching English as a Second Foreign Language. New York: Newsbury House, 1979.. 302-307.
  • 6MIEKLEY J. ESL Textbook Evaluation Checklist [EB/OL]. http://www. Readingmatrix.com/reading _projects/miekley/proj ect. pdf, 2015-07-12.
  • 7Guidelines for Approval of Textbooks [EB/OL]. http://www, edu. gov. on. ca/trilliumlist/guide, pdf, 2015-02-11.
  • 8The Ameriean Association for the Advancement of Science. Project 2061 Analysis Procedure [EB/OL]. http://www, project2061, org/publications/ textbook/hsbio/report/ analysis.htm/ , 2014-12-18.
  • 9Florida Department of Education. Priorities for Evaluating Instructional Materials.. Research Update [EB/OL]. http://www, fldoe, org/BII/ instr uct_mat/eval.asp/, 2014-12-16.
  • 10徐鹏,郑国民.国外中学教材评价研究的比较及启示[J].外国中小学教育,2012(7):62-65. 被引量:11

二级参考文献31

  • 1林崇德.教育的智慧[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2005.25,25.
  • 2冯忠良,等.教育心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2009.
  • 3吴明隆.结构方程模型--AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:40-52.
  • 4彭耽龄.普通心理学(修订版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2004:321.
  • 5李维.小学儿童教育心理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001.2.
  • 6Michael Eraut,&Len Goad,&George Smith.The Analysis of Curriculum Materials[M].Falmer. University of Sussex Press, 1975.79, 103-108.
  • 7Alan Cunningsworth.Choosing Your Coursebook [M]. Oxford: Macmillan Education, 1995.
  • 8Brian Tomlinson. Developing Materials for Language Teaching[M]. London: Continuum Press,2003. 15-36.
  • 9The American Association for the Advancement of Science. Project 2061 Analysis Procedure[EB/OL]. http://www.proj ect2061, org/publications/textbook/hsbio/ report/analysis.htm/2010-03-05.
  • 10Flodida Department of Education.Priorities for Evaluating Instructional Materials:Research Update. [EB/OL]. http://www.fldoe.org/BII/instruct mat/eval.asp/ 2010-03-05,.

共引文献29

同被引文献183

引证文献24

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部