期刊文献+

高中生的社会性科学议题解决能力及其与科学本质观的关系 被引量:8

High School Students' Problem-Solving Skills in A Socio-Scientific Issue and Its Relationships with the Belief of the Nature of Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 个体持有的科学本质观与社会性科学议题解决能力具有密切关系,但关系的性质却争论颇多,更是缺少中国被试的数据。研究调查了河南省61名高中一年级学生的社会性科学议题决策与推理的特点、持有的科学本质观。通过定性与定量相结合的分析方法,结果发现:(1)56名高中生能够基于社会、经济、生态和科技取向的证据进行非正式推理;(2)被试均能提出支持自己观点的论辩、相反观点的论辩以及反驳性论辩;(3)高中生持有一种现代的、建构主义的科学本质观;(4)高中生对科学知识的变化与暂时性特点的认同程度与他们在社会性科学议题推理中所提出的科学取向的论辩数量显著正相关。 Individuals' beliefs of the nature of science are closely related to their problem-solving skills in socio-scientific issues. But the nature of the relationships is very controversial and lack of evidence in Chinese context. Using both quantitative and qualitative research methods, the present study investigated 61 Chinese high school students' belief of the nature of science. It soning based on evidences in the could raise arguments that could lute other's views; (3) participa decision-making and reasoning on a socio-scientific issue, and students' is found that: (1) fifty-six high school students could make informal reaaspects of society, economy, ecology and science; (2) all participants support their views, that were opposite to their views and that could rents tended to identify with modern and constructive view of the nature of science; and (4) participants' identification on the changing and tentative feature of scientific knowledge was positively correlated with the number of science-oriented arguments that they proposed in their reasoning on the socio-scientific issue.
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期29-38,共10页 Journal of Educational Studies
关键词 社会性科学议题 科学本质 科学教育 非正式推理 socio-scientific issue nature of science science education informal reasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1蔡铁权,叶梓.思维导图在社会性科学议题教学中的应用[J].教育科学研究,2009(12):52-55. 被引量:14
  • 2钱启兰.初中生社会性科学议题教学研究--以"泥石流"议题为例[D].浙江金华:浙江师范大学,2011.
  • 3Sadler, T. D. , Zeidler, D. L. Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision mak- ing[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2005 (1) : 112-138.
  • 4Sadler, T. D. , Zeidler, D. L. The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding so- eioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to ge- netic engineering issues[J]. Science Education, 2005 ( 1 ) : 71-93.
  • 5Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Aekett, W. A., . Simmons, M. L. Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilem- mas[J]. Science Education,2002(3) : 343-367.
  • 6季薛庆,季庆燕.社会性科学议题情境中科学本质教学——以转基因作物为例[J].全球教育展望,2013,42(2):124-128. 被引量:7
  • 7孟献华,李广洲.国外“社会性科学议题”课程及其研究综述[J].比较教育研究,2010,31(11):31-36. 被引量:56
  • 8[ Sadler, T. D. Informal reasoning regarding socioscien- tific issues: A critical review of research[J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2004(5) : 513-536.
  • 9Solomon, J. The discussion of social issues in the scih enee elassroom[J]. Science Education, 1990 (1) : 105- 126.
  • 10. Lee, Y. C., Grace,' M. Students" reasoning and de- cision making about a soeioseientific issue: A cross- context comparison [J]. Science Education, 2012 ( 5 ) : 787-807.

二级参考文献34

  • 1张奇,张黎.SSI课程与学生非形式推理能力的培养[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2007,25(2):59-64. 被引量:14
  • 2林树声.科学教室中的社会性科学议题之教学,http://140.130.170.28:8080/ir/bitstream/987654321/1264/1.
  • 3Zeidler, D L. & Keefer, M. The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education[A].In D L. Zeidler (ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education[C]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2003, 7-33.
  • 4Zeidler D L, Sadler T D, Simmons M L, Howes E V. Beyond STS: A Research-Based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education[J]. Science Education. 2005, 89 (3) : 357- 377.
  • 5托尼·巴赞.思维导图-放射性思维[M].李斯,译.北京:作家出版社,1998:56.
  • 6Bingle W. & Gaskell P. Scientific Literacy for Decision Making and the Socialconstruction of Scientific Knowledge. Science Education, 1994, 78 (2) : 185-201.
  • 7Fuglsang L. Three Perspective in STS in the Policy Context. In Cutcliffe S. & Mitcham C. (Ed.) Visions of STS : Counter Points in Science, Technology, and Science Studies. Albany, N Y: State University of New York Press, 2001,12.
  • 8Qualification and Curriculum Authority. The National Curriculum for England. Key Stages 14. London: Crown, 1999, 57.
  • 9KMK. Bildungs Standards im Fach Biologie fur den Mittleren Schulabschluss. Luchterhand. 2005,54.
  • 10Zeidler D. (Ed.) The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, 12, 85, 183,238.

共引文献67

同被引文献29

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部