期刊文献+

生物学科能力及其表现研究 被引量:33

Composition and Performance of Biology Competency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 培养学生的生物学科能力是科学教育的一项重要目标。通过分析和比较PISA、TIMSS、NAEP三个大型的国际科学测评项目,基于学习过程的信息加工模型,构建了由学习理解、实践应用和迁移创新三个能力要素构成的生物学科能力体系模型,并将学生的生物学科能力表现划分为五个水平。经过实证检验,可见生物学科能力体系模型是成立的。测评结果显示,从7年级到12年级,学生的生物学科能力由简单到复杂,能力表现逐渐上升。这对科学课程的设计、课堂教学和学科能力评价都有重要的参考价值。 Improving students' biology competency is one of the essential objectives for school science education. By analyzing and comparing the three large international science assessment frameworks, name ly, PISA, TIMSS, and NAEP, on the basis of information processing model of learning process, the authors constructed biology competency model consisting of three competency elements (i. e. , apprehension, application and innovation), and five levels of students' learning performance on biology competency. Empirical evidence derived from science assessment fully supports the model, and it also showed that students' biology competency increased with their grade level from Grade 7 to Grade 12; and students developed more complicated competency and had better performance as grade increased. The results shed light on curriculum design, teaching, and assessment of biology competency.
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期64-72,共9页 Journal of Educational Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金"十二五"规划2011年度教育学重点课题"中小学生学科能力表现研究"(课题批准号AHA110005)资助。总课题由北京师范大学王磊教授主持 9个学科组成的学科教育团队协同研究。"中小学生生物学科能力表现研究"子课题负责人是王健 核心成员有:王聪 刘志爽
关键词 生物学科能力 学科素养 学习理解 实践应用 迁移创新 学习表现 biology competency subject accomplishment apprehension application innovation learning performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Sci-ence education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas [M]. Washington, D. C: The National A- cademies Press, 2012: 41-46.
  • 2林崇德.论学科能力的建构[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1997(1):5-12. 被引量:146
  • 3胡卫平,罗来辉.论中学生科学思维能力的结构[J].学科教育,2001(2):27-31. 被引量:29
  • 4林崇德.从智力到学科能力[J].课程.教材.教法,2015,35(1):9-20. 被引量:111
  • 5National Research Council. National Science Education Standards [M]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.. 22-23.
  • 6OECD. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Frame- work: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Lit- eracy [M]. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. 2016: 20.
  • 7Ina V. S. Mullis Michael O. Martin. TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks [M]. MA: Chestnut Hill, 2013 : 8.
  • 8National Assessment Governing Board. Science Frame- work for the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress [M]. Washington, DC.. National Academies Press, 2014.. 61-73.
  • 9Gagne, R. M. Essentials of Learning for Instruction. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press, 19741 16.
  • 10黄越岭,朱德全.复杂性与情境性的耦合:网络学习评价的新取向及其路径探求[J].电化教育研究,2013,34(7):47-52. 被引量:17

二级参考文献37

共引文献504

同被引文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部