期刊文献+

法学汉译的原则与变通 被引量:1

Principles and Flexibility of Chinese Translation of Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文首先提出了法学翻译的基本原则,解释了什么是"直译"及其和"信雅达"之间的关系,并论证直译对于法学翻译的必要性。然后,本文从字词和句子两个层面上探讨直译原则的实践操作,以及必要的变通。最后,本文对初译者提出几条可供参考的具体建议。初译者应毫无保留地将直译作为原则,只有在为了照顾中文表达习惯的情况下才在尊重原意的基础上,对原文结构进行必要的调整。 This article summarizes the basic principles governing legal translation, explains the "literal translation" con- cept and its relationship with the accepted Chinese precepts of "authenticity, elegance and expressivity", and discusses the ne- cessity of literal translation for translating legal works. The article then explores the practical application of literal transition at the levels of words and sentences, as well as its necessary variations. It ends with several specific recommendations for the be- ginners in translating legal works. A beginner should always take literal translation as the principle, and adjust the structure in the original sentence only when it is necessary in view of accommodating the custom of Chinese expression and on the condition that such variation accurately expresses the original meaning.
作者 张千帆
出处 《法学评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期15-22,共8页 Law Review
关键词 直译 意译 信雅达 法学翻译 Literal Translation Liberal Translation Authenticity Elegance and Expressivity Legal Translation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1奥利弗.温德尔.霍姆斯,张千帆,杨春福,黄斌.法律的道路[J].南京大学法律评论,2000(2):6-19. 被引量:32
  • 2许钧.《关键在于为翻译正确定位》,载《光明日报》2005年3月21日.
  • 3“羞煞严复,气煞休谟——评刘仲敬译《英国史》”,http://book.douban.com/review/6813564/.
  • 4陈天助.《茅盾翻译与现代汉语运用》,载《光明日报》2005年4月8日.
  • 5See V.J. Cook and Mark Newson, Chomsky's Universal Grammar (3rd Ed.), New York: Wiley (2007).
  • 6Denis J. Galligan and Mila Versteeg, Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, New York: Cambridge Univer- sity Press (2013), p. 3.
  • 7Ralph Ketcham (ed.), Selected Writings of James Madison, Indianapolis.. Hackett (2006), p. 199.
  • 8Cass R. Sunstein, Constitutionalism after the New Deal, 101 Harvard Law Review 421 (1987).
  • 9Ketcham, Selected Writings of James Madison, p. 199.
  • 10Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Common Law, Boston.. Little, Brown and Co. (1948), p. 131.

共引文献31

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部