期刊文献+

调查性反恐拘留比较研究与ICCPR分析及对我国之启示 被引量:3

Comparative Research and ICCPR Analysis of Investigatively Counter- terrorist Detention and Its Enlightenment for Our Country
原文传递
导出
摘要 如何在现行法律框架下先发制敌地进行反恐拘留是我国现行《反恐怖主义法》仍未解决的问题。法治发达国家通过降低对恐怖嫌犯的调查性拦截与调查性逮捕的标准并延长其拘留期限来修正根植于刑事法律框架内的调查性拘留体制,从而发展出了调查性反恐拘留这种修正体制,该体制具有较强的先发制敌的反恐功能。令人欣慰的是,该体制并不违反《公民权利与政治权利国际公约》关于任意拘留的禁止性规定。并且,它对我国具有重要启示:通过降低对恐怖活动人员的盘查、先行拘留和逮捕的启动标准,并延长对其先行拘留、侦查羁押和审查起诉期间的羁押期,打造适合我国的调查性反恐拘留体制。 How to preemptively detain terrorist in the current legal framework is an unsolved problem in the current(( Counter - Terrorism Act of 2016))of China. By lowering the threshold of investigative stop and investigative arrest of a terrorist suspect and prolonging his period of detention, developed countries under the rule of law modified the regime of investigative detention rooted in the criminal framework, leading to a correct regime of investigatively counter- terrorist detention, which is of the stronger capacity of countering terrorist. To one' s relief, this regime is compatible with prohibition against arbitrary detention under ICCPR. And it gives an important enlightenment for our country: create a regime of investigatively counter - terrorist detention appropriate to our country by lowering the threshold of stopping and first detaining and arresting a terrorist suspect, and by prolonging his period of detention of first detaining and custody for the sake of investigation and for conducting examination before prosecution.
作者 简基松 熊亮
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期33-45,共13页 Law Science Magazine
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助 即中南财经政法大学博士生科研创新课题"各国反恐拘留之比较研究与人权法分析及对我国之启示"(2015B0611)的研究成果 教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"和平崛起背景下中国对外单边经济制裁法律问题研究"(13YJA820018)的阶段性成果
关键词 调查性拘留 调查性反恐拘留 《公民权利与政治权利国际公约》 investigative detention investigatively counter - terrorist detention ICCPR
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Christine M. Wiseman, "THE' REASONABLENESS' OF THE INVESTIGATIVE DETENTION: AN' AD HOC' CONSTITUTIONAL TEST", MARQUETTE LAW REVIEW, Summer 1984,vol. 67, No. 4.
  • 2Dan E. Stigall, Counterterrorism and the Comparative Law of Investigative Detention,Cambria Press,2009.
  • 3Dan E. Stigall, Counterterrorism and the Comparative Law of Investigative Detention,Cambria Press,2009 ,p6.
  • 4Ministere de la Justice Circulaire, September 10,1986,1986 Receuil Dalloz - Sirey,legislation [ D. S. L. ] 487.
  • 5W. Jason Fisher, Militant Islamicist Terrorism in Europe : Are France & The United Kingdom Legally Prepared for the Challenge? ,6 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. Rev. 255,266 -67 (2007).
  • 6CLIVE WALKER, BLACKSTONE' S GUIDE TO THE ANTI- TERRORISM LEGISLATION XI (2002), at 146.
  • 7Criminal Justice and Public Order Act of 1994, s. 60 ( 1 ), substituted ( 1.3. 1999) by 1997 c. 21, s. 8 (2) ; S.I. 1999/ 5, art. 2.
  • 8Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nevada,542 U. S. 177(2004).
  • 9Hiibel,542 U. S. at 183.
  • 10United States v. Moreno,475 F. 2d 44 (5'h Cir. 1973).

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部