期刊文献+

论律师民事责任的承担及其制度建构 被引量:3

On the Civil Liability of Lawyer and Its System Construction in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 在律师与当事人之间并不总是存在一体性的事实。如果律师不能忠实履行职业义务,当事人会基于合同或者侵权事实等原因向律师提出民事赔偿之诉。这不仅因为律师刑事辩护而引起,而且还可基于律师民事代理而发生。当事人对律师提出民事赔偿之诉有不利律师职业利益的一面,但是从深层或者长远考虑,其还是能够起到实质性保护当事人利益以及有效调节法律服务市场从而达到通过经济赔偿实现对律师服务质量控制的目的。关键在于如何通过律师民事责任具体制度的调适以及相关配套制度的建构来真正发挥律师民事责任之功效。 The relationship between lawyers and the parties is undoubtedly the most important relationship in their professional activities, which is the basis for establishing the relationship between the lawyer and the judge or the prosecutor, and is the origin of the interaction between lawyers and other parties. However, interests between lawyers and the parties are not always the same. If the lawyer can not faithfully fulfill the professional obligations, the parties will bring a suit of civil compensation against the lawyers based on the contract or tort facts and other reasons, which is not only due to the lawyer' s criminal defense, but also based on the lawyer' s civil agent. The parties proposing civil compensation lawsuit has adverse professional interests side against the lawyers, however, from deep or long - term consideration, which is able to protect the interests of the parties and to effectively regulate the legal service market, so as to achieve to realize the purpose of lawyer service quality control through economic compensation, and the key lies in how to adjust the specific system through civil liability of the lawyers, as well as the relevant supporting system construction, so as to really olav the efficacy of the lawyer's civil liability.
作者 宋远升
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第9期86-93,共8页 Law Science Magazine
关键词 刑事辩护律师 民事代理律师 民事责任建构调适 criminal defense lawyer civil attorney civil liability construction adjustment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1许晖:《透视中国最高额律师责任赔偿案》,http://www.people.com.cn/BIGS/shehui/46/20010908/555139访问日期:2016年4月25日.
  • 2[日]松尾浩也.《日本刑事诉讼法》(上),丁相顺译,中国人民大学出版社,2005年版,第177页.
  • 3吴纪奎.论辩护律师的民事责任[J].环球法律评论,2012,34(6):82-96. 被引量:6
  • 4廖艳.论人权法对社会分层的规制[J].政法论丛,2015(4):31-37. 被引量:1
  • 5George Hampel and Jonathan Clough, Abolishing the Adcocate' s Immunity from Suit: Reconsidering Giannarelli v Wraith, p. 1023.
  • 6George Hampel and Jonathan Clough, Abolishing the Advocate' s Immunity from Suit: Reconsidering Giannarelli v Wraith,p. 1023.
  • 7George Hampel and Jonathan Clough, Abolishing the Advocate' s Immunity from Suit : Reconsidering Giannarelli v Wraith,24 Melbourne University Law Review (2000) , p. 1022.
  • 8[美]马丁·梅耶.《美国律师》,胡显耀译,江苏人民出版社2001年版,第175—178页
  • 9John L. Powell. Q.C. , Professional and Client : The Duty of Care, Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty - First Century, edited by Peter Sirks, Clarendon Press. Oxford, 1996, p. 47.
  • 10Herstonv. Whitesell, 348 So. 2d 1054, 1057 (Ala. 1977).

二级参考文献72

  • 1孙立平.权力和市场的“非法婚姻”[J].中国改革,2006(4):76-76. 被引量:3
  • 2张田勘.错案赔偿在美国[J].民主与法制,2007(08S):32-33. 被引量:4
  • 3[荷兰]亨克·范·马尔塞文,格尔·范·德·唐著,陈云生译.《成文宪法-通过计算机进行的比较研究》,北京大学出版社2007年,第224页.
  • 4[美]波普诺,李强,等(译).社会学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:126.
  • 5[奥]曼弗雷德·诺瓦克.国际人权制度导论[M].柳华文译.北京:北京大学出版社,2010.
  • 6[美]罗尔斯 何怀宏等译.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988..
  • 7[英]哈特 张文显等译.法律的概念[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1996..
  • 8[美]埃里克·方纳 王希译.美国自由的故事[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002..
  • 9[德]耶林,胡宝海译.为权利而斗争[A].梁慧星.为权利而斗争[C].北京:中国法制出版社,2000.2.
  • 10邛伟:《3名律师被判赔偿800万》,《中国保险报》2004年12月23日.

共引文献14

同被引文献24

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部