期刊文献+

人格判断的自我—他人一致性:熟悉度和亲密度的作用 被引量:5

Self-other Agreement in Judgments of Personality:The Role of Acquaintanceship and Closeness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 关系质量是影响人格判断准确性的重要因素,该研究分别在男性、女性朋友两个样本中考查了熟悉度与关系亲密度对人格判断自我—他人一致性(SOA)的影响,结果表明:(1)神经质的自我评定显著高于朋友评定,责任心的自我评定显著低于朋友评定;(2)两个样本中大五人格所有维度的SOA都达到了显著水平,尽管女性样本中外倾性、宜人性和责任心的SOA均比男性样本高,但两样本之间不存在显著差异;(3)两样本聚合的SOA中,外倾性最高(r=0.41),责任心其次(r=0.36),神经质和开放性最低(均为r=0.21);(4)除了男性样本中的外倾性,熟悉度对其他维度的SOA都没有显著调节效应;(5)两样本中关系亲密度对所有人格维度SOA的调节效应均不显著。 The quality of relationship is an important factor which affects the accuracy of personality judgment. The present research investigated the influences of acquaintanceship and relationship closeness on the self- other agreement( SOA) in personality judgment on the male and female friends respectively,and the result revealed:( 1) The judge of neuroticism from self was significantly higher than from friends; the judge of conscientiousness from self was significantly lower than from friends.( 2) The SOA of all the dimension of the Big Five reached the significant level on both two samples. Although the SOA of extroversion,agreeableness and conscientiousness of females samples were higher than the males samples,but there was no significant difference between two samples.( 3) In the convergent SOA of two samples,extroversion was the highest( r = 0. 41),conscientiousness was the second( r = 0. 36); and neuroticism and openness were the last( r = 0. 21);( 4) Except for extroversion on the males sample,the acquaintanceship of two samples had no significant moderating effect on the SOA of other dimensions.( 5) The relationship closeness of both two samples had no significant moderating effect on the SOA of all personality dimensions.
作者 陈少华
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期343-348,共6页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 人格判断 自我—他人一致性 熟悉度 亲密度 调节效应 personality judgment self-other agreement acquaintanceship closeness moderating effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献158

  • 1戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 2王登峰,崔红.行为的跨情境一致性及人格与行为的关系——对人格内涵及其中西方差异的理论与实证分析[J].心理学报,2006,38(4):543-552. 被引量:60
  • 3Kurtz JE, Sherker JL. Relationship quality, trait similarity, and serf-other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates. Journal of Personality, 2003, 71:21-48.
  • 4Funder DC. On seeing ourselves as others see us: Self-other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings. Journal of Personality, 1980, 48:473-493.
  • 5Funder DC, West SG. Consensus, self-other agreement, and accuracy in personality judgment: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 1993, 61:457-496.
  • 6Letzring TD, Wells SM, Funder DC. Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006, 91(1): 111-123.
  • 7Funder DC, Colvin CR. Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 55:149-158.
  • 8Funder DC, Dobroth KM. Differences between traits; Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52:409-418.
  • 9Watson D, Hubbard B, Wiese D. Self- other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78:546-558.
  • 10Kammann R, Smith R, Martin C, McQueen M. Low accuracy in judgments of other's psychological well-being as seen from a phenomenological perspective. Journal of Personality, 1984, 52:107-123.

共引文献329

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部