摘要
以五百多份律师调查问卷为分析样本,可以发现,新修订的刑事诉讼法自实施以来,我国检察机关在刑事诉讼活动中法律监督权的整体运行效果较好,但检察机关对立案、侦查活动的监督有待进一步加强,检察机关对执业律师的权利救济也有进一步完善的空间。对检察机关刑事法律监督权的改进与完善应当遵循刑事诉讼法的基本原则、制度和程序规范,找寻薄弱的监督环节,完善监督的手段和方法。与此同时,检察机关应重点从思想和行动上切实保障执业律师的辩护权。同时,要进一步增强检察机关对侦查活动的监督效果,积极引导侦查。建立重大案件,尤其是命案侦查检察机关提前介入机制;考虑制定常见罪名的证据要求和取证规范指导侦查,对于检察环节发现的非法证据坚决排除。
Based on a wide-ranging questionnaire to over 500 China's Lawyers, it is found that since the 2012 revised Criminal Procedure Law, China's People's Procuratorate has taken an relatively active role and got a good effect in the legal supervision. While, the supervision of the case-filing process and police's investigative conducts and the the remedy to lawyers" rights should still be advanced. In the near future, according to the basic principle of Criminal Procedure Law, the method of procuratorate~ legal supervision should be promoted ; the supervision of investigation should be intensified through the mechanism of " proeuratorate guides the police (especially in the serious homicide cases) ; the requirements of evidence-collection in common criminal cases should be set up and the exclusionary rule should be put into practice.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第9期47-58,共12页
Hebei Law Science
基金
单民教授主持的最高人民检察院检察理论研究所2016年度重大课题项目:<实证视野下检察机关刑事法律监督权的改进与完善>(JL2016A03)的阶段性研究成果
作者参与的2014年国家社科基金<检察环节刑事错案成因与对策的实证研究>(14CFX023)的成果之一
湖南大学"腐败预防与惩治协同创新中心子平台研究成果"
关键词
实证视角
检察机关
刑事诉讼
法律监督
侦查监督
empirical study
procuratorate
criminal justice
legal supervision
investigative supervision