期刊文献+

PETS口试评分培训效果的多面Rasch分析 被引量:5

Study on the effects of rater training for PETS speaking tests with Many-Facet Rasch Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究以PETS-1级拟聘口试教师为研究对象,对口试教师评分的培训效果进行了研究。采用多面Rasch分析对比口试教师接受培训前后的评分效果。结果发现:培训后,提升了口试教师与专家评分完全一致的比率,评分偏于严格的口试教师在评分标准上做了恰当的调整,所有口试教师评分拟合值都在可接受范围内,总体上,口试教师评分的培训比较有效,培训后提升了评分的准确性。多面Rasch分析有助于发现评分过于宽松、过于严格、评分拟合差的口试教师以及评分异常情况,为开展有针对性的培训提供了可靠的依据。 This article describes a study conducted to explore rater training effects of the inexperienced raters on speaking tests, Public English Test System Level 1 ( PETS - 1 ), by comparing the quality of scoring before and after training with Many- Facet Rasch Analysis. The analysis shows that, the raters achieve a significant increase in exact agreement percentage between inexperienced raters and expert judges after training. After training, too strict teacher ratings on speaking made appropriate adjustments, all teachers get the good Infit and Outfit values which are within the acceptable range. In general, rater training for PETS speaking tests reveals positive effects and ratings are improved. Many-Facet Rasch analysis helps discover too loose, too strict, and poor fitting raters, as well as abnormal scoring, which all provide a reliable basis for carrying out targeted training to raters.
作者 李英 关丹丹
机构地区 教育部考试中心
出处 《外语教学理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期43-48,共6页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基金 全国教育考试"十一五"科研规划重点课题(2009年度)"全国英语等级考试口试教师培训效果及评分信度研究"(2009JKS3056)研究成果
关键词 PETS 口试 评分 培训效果 多面Rasch分析 PETS speaking test rating training effect Many-Facet Rasch Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献52

  • 1郭茜,邢如,沈明波.口试评分规范化与信度研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2003,24(S1):135-139. 被引量:12
  • 2田清源.主观评分中多面Rasch模型的应用[J].心理学探新,2006,26(1):70-73. 被引量:16
  • 3杨群,邱江,张庆林.四卡问题解决中的视角效应[J].心理学探新,2007,27(1):30-33. 被引量:14
  • 4孔文,张守进,李清华.发展中的语言行为测试——国外研究综述[J].现代外语,2007,30(2):200-208. 被引量:15
  • 5Engelhard, G J. The measurement of writing ability with a many facet Rasch Model[J]. Applied Measurement in Education, 1992 (5) .
  • 6Linacre J M. Facets - Rasch measurement computer program.Chicago, Winsteps.com, 2006.
  • 7Saal F E, Downey R G, Lahey M A. Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1980,88(2).
  • 8Linacre J M. What do infit, outfit, mean-square and standardized mean? [J] Rasch Measurement Transactions.2002, 16.
  • 9Engelhard, G J. Examining Rater Error in the Assessment of Written Composition with a Many-Faceted Rasch Model [J]. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1994, 31 (2).
  • 10Brown, A. (1995). The effect of rater variables in the devel- opment of an occupation-specific performance test [ J ]. Language Tes- ting, 12(1) : 1-15.

共引文献36

同被引文献107

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部