期刊文献+

影响胸腰椎爆裂骨折间接复位的相关因素分析 被引量:2

Influencing factors for reposition of bone fragment in thoracolumbar burst fracture:analysis of 62 patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的明确在胸腰椎椎体爆裂骨折中正中椎管矢状径压缩比率、后突骨折块翻转角度对后突骨折块复位的影响。方法回顾性分析2010-2014年本科收治的62例单个胸腰椎椎体爆裂骨折患者的临床资料。根据患者术中C臂透视结果分为复位组34例和未复位组28例。骨折采用AO分型,神经损伤采用ASIA分级。根据术中测量伤椎平面椎管正中矢状径压缩比率、后突骨折块翻转角度并进行统计学分析。结果未复位组椎管正中矢状径压缩比率[(59.8±20.6)%]与复位组[(18.1±11.3)%]比较,差异有统计学意义(t=9.581,P<0.01);未复位组后突骨折块的翻转角度[(38.1±18.7)°]与复位组[(21.7±11.6)°]比较,差异有统计学意义(t=4.041,P<0.01)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,AO骨折分型(Wald=6.415,P<0.05)及椎管正中矢状径压缩比率(Wald=5.417,P<0.05)与后突骨折块复位有有关;ASIA分级(Wald=3.816,P>0.05)及术前骨折块翻转角度(Wald=0.421,P>0.05)与后突骨折块复位无关。结论椎管正中矢状径压缩比率及骨折的AO分型是胸腰椎爆裂骨折中后突骨折块能否复位的重要评估指标。 rotation angle of bone Objective To determine the effect of mid-sagittal canal compromise correlation and fragments on the reposition of bone fragment after thoracolumbar burst fracture. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on 62 patients with single thoracolumbar burst fracture admitted in our department from 2010 to 2014. According to the results of C-arm X-ray system during the operation, the patients were divided into the reposition group (n = 34) and non-reposition (n = 28 ). The fractures were classified according to AO classification. Neurological status was evaluated according to the ASIA grade. The rotation angle of bone fragment and calculates the mid-sagittal canal compression ratio were analyzed. Results There were significant differences in the mid-sagittal canal compression ratio between the reposition group and the nonreposition [ ( 18.1 ± 11.3) % vs (59.8 ±20.6) %, t = 9. 581, P 〈 0.01 ], and in the rotation angles of bone fragments [ (38.1 ± 18.7)° vs (21.7 ± 11.6)°, t =4. 041, P 〈0.01 ]. Logistic regression analysis indicated that AO classification (Wald =6. 415, P 〈0.05) and mid-sagittal canal compression ratio (Wald = 5. 417, P 〈 0. 05) were correlated with the reposition of bone fragments, while ASIA grade (Wald =3. 816, P 〉0.05 ) had no such correlation. Conclusions AO classification and mid-sagittal canal compression ratio are predictors of assessing the reposition of bone fragments in the thoracolumbar fractures.
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第17期1968-1971,共4页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
关键词 脊柱 爆裂骨折 后突骨折块 复位 spine burst fractures bone fragment reposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1程旗,吴元勇,李建,何轩.前路椎体部分切除减压短节段固定术治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折[J].第三军医大学学报,2009,31(6):552-554. 被引量:5
  • 2袁海峰,宋跃明,刘浩,刘立岷,龚全,李涛,曾建成,孔清泉.无神经损伤的胸腰椎严重爆裂骨折的手术治疗[J].第三军医大学学报,2010,32(8):836-838. 被引量:5
  • 3Smith H E, Anderson D G, Vaccaro A R, et al. Anatomy,Biomechanics, and Classification of Thoracolumbar Injuries [J]. Semin Spine Surg, 2010, 22(1): 2-7.
  • 4Yugue I, Aono K, Shiba K, et al. Analysis of the risk factors for severity of neurologic status in 216 patients with thoraco- lumbar and lumbar burst fractures [ J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 2011, 36(19) : 1563 - 1569.
  • 5Shamji M F, Roffey D M, Young D K, eta/. A pilot evaluation of the role of bracing in stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit [ J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2014, 27(7) : 370- 375.
  • 6Hashimoto T, Kaneda K, Abumi K. Relationship between traumatic spinal canal stenosis and neurologic deficits in tho- racolumbar burst fractures [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 1988, 13(11):1268-1272.
  • 7Guerra J Jr, Garfin S R, Resnick D. Vertebral burst frac- tures: CT analysis of the retropulsed fragment [ J ]. Radiolo- gy, 1984, 153 (3) : 769 - 772.
  • 8Shi J, Yang H. Comparison of radiography and computed tomography in evaluating posterior indirect reduction of spinal canal bone fragment [J]. Orthopedics, 2010, 33(3).
  • 9Gertzbein S D. Scoliosis Research Society. Muhicenter spine fracture study [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1992, 17(5) : 528 - 540.
  • 10Whang P G, Vaccaro A R. Thoracolumbar fracture: posteri- or instrumentation using distraction and ligamentotaxis reduc- tion [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2007, 15(11): 695 - 701.

二级参考文献18

  • 1宋跃明,刘立岷,龚全,刘浩,李涛,饶书城,胡云洲.前路减压固定植骨融合治疗胸腰椎骨折合并脊髓损伤[J].中华创伤杂志,2006,22(1):20-23. 被引量:71
  • 2钱邦平,邱勇,王斌,俞扬,朱泽章.后外侧融合对胸腰椎爆裂型骨折疗效的影响[J].中华创伤杂志,2006,22(2):121-125. 被引量:44
  • 3李佛保,郑召民.脊柱脊髓损伤的修复重建研究进展[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2006,20(4):324-330. 被引量:8
  • 4李自耀,田宁,陈宝忠.经椎体侧后方椎体内植骨治疗胸腰段脊椎骨折12例[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(7):587-588. 被引量:2
  • 5Boeree N R, Harley J, Jackson R K, et al. Fixation of spinal fractures: can failure be predicted?[C]. Bristal: British Scoliosis Society Annual Meeting, 1994 : 58 - 61.
  • 6Lee C K, Langrana N A. Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study[J]. Spine, 1984, 9(6) : 574 -581.
  • 7Chow D H, Luk K D, Evans J H, et al. Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments [J]. Spine, 1996, 21(5): 549-555.
  • 8Beaman D N, Graziano G P, Glover R A, et al. Substance P innervation of lumbar spine facet joints[J]. Spine, 1993, 18 (8) : 1044-1049.
  • 9Miyakoshi N , Abe E, Shimada Y, et al. Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion [ J ]. Spine, 2000, 25(14) : 1837 - 1842.
  • 10Breeze S W, Doherty B J, Noble P S, et al. A biomechanical study of anterior thoracolumbar screw fixation [ J ]. Spine, 1998, 23 ( 17 ) : 1829 - 1831.

共引文献8

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部