期刊文献+

雷替曲塞联合奈达铂同步螺旋断层放疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的临床研究 被引量:7

Clinical study of raltitrexed plus nedaplatin combined with concurrent helical tomotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较雷替曲塞联合奈达铂与多西他塞联合奈达铂同步螺旋断层放疗(HT)治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析2011年3月至2015年4月84例初治局部晚期鼻咽癌患者的临床资料,其中31例接受雷替曲塞联合奈达铂方案同步HT治疗(RN+HT组),53例接受多西他赛联合奈达铂方案同步HT治疗(DN+HT组)。HT处方剂量:PGTVnx及PGTVnd 70~72Gy/33次,PTV1 60Gy/33次,PTV2 50Gy/28次,5次/周。RN+HT组:雷替曲塞2.5 mg/m^2静滴,d_1;奈达铂共75 mg/m^2静滴,d_1~d_5。DN+HT组:多西他赛35~40 mg/m^2静滴,d_1、d_8;奈达铂共75 mg/m^2静滴,d_1~d_5。两组化疗方案均以21天为1周期,化疗2个周期。比较两组的远期生存情况和不良反应。结果全组中位随访21.5个月。RN+HT组局部复发1例,远处转移2例,死亡2例;DN+HT组局部复发2例,远处转移3例,死亡3例。RN+HT组和DN+HT组的2年生存率分别为93.5%和94.3%,2年无进展生存率分别为90.3%和90.6%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组急性不良反应包括口腔黏膜炎、皮肤损伤、腮腺损伤、咽喉炎、白细胞减少、体重减轻及恶心呕吐等,多为1~2级。DN+HT组恶心呕吐的发生率高于RN+HT组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其他不良反应发生率的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组晚期损伤主要为皮肤损伤、皮下纤维化和口干症,不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 RN方案同步HT是局部晚期鼻咽癌的有效治疗方案,且不良反应可耐受。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and toxicities for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by helical tomotherapy (HT) in combination with ra]titrexed plus nedaplatin chemotherapy (RN+HT) or with docetaxel plus nedaplatin chemotherapy(DN+HT). Methods A total of 84 diagnosed local/regional advanced NPC patients from Mar 2011 to Apr 2015 were enrolled in this study, among whom 31 cases received RN+HT treatment (rahitrexed 2. 5 mg/m^2 iv, d1 ;nedaplatin in to- tal 75 mg/m^2 iv,d1-d5) , and 53 cases received DN+HT treatment (docetaxel 35-40 mg/m^2 iv, d1 ,d8; nedaplatin in total 75 mg/m^2 iv, d1 -d5 ). All the patients were treated with chemotherapy for 2 cycles with 21 days as a cycle. Long-term efficacy and toxicities were compared between the two groups. Results The median follow-up period was 21.5 months of 84 patients. There were 1 case of local recurrence, 2 cases of distant metastasis, and 2 cases of death in RN+HT group. And in DN+HT group, there were 2 case of local re- currence, 3 cases of distant metastasis and 3 cases of death. The 2-year survival rate of RN+HT and DN+HT groups was 93.5% and 94. 3%(P〉0.05), and the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 90. 3% and 90. 6%(P〉0. 05). The most common acute adverse reactions were 1-2 grade mucosa reaction, skin injury, hematologic toxicities, weight loss, parotid injury, sphagitis and nausea/vomit- ting. Nausea/vomitting was higher in DN+HT group than in RN+HT group (P〈0.05) , and no differences were found in other adverse actions between the two groups( P〉0. 05). Chronic injuries included skin injury, subcutaneous fibrosis and xerostomia, and no differ- ences were found between the two groups (P〉0. 05). Conclusion RN+HT is effective and well-tollerated for locally advanced NPC.
出处 《临床肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2016年第8期727-731,共5页 Chinese Clinical Oncology
关键词 鼻咽癌 螺旋断层放射治疗(HT) 化学治疗 雷替曲塞 奈达铂 Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Helical tomotherapy (HT) Chemotherapy Rahitrexed Nedaplatin
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

二级参考文献166

  • 1管忠震.鼻咽癌化学治疗的概况[J].癌症,1989,8(2):120-121. 被引量:66
  • 2肖建平,徐国镇,高黎,秦德兴,蔡伟民,李素艳.鼻咽癌初程放疗后残存的分次X刀治疗初探[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(2):77-80. 被引量:24
  • 3王新强,程秀祯,王世伟,代培永,林祥来,杨怀泮.放疗联合PF方案同步治疗中晚期食管癌[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(3):215-215. 被引量:52
  • 4赵充,卢泰祥,韩非,卢丽霞,黄劭敏,邓小武,林承光,崔念基.139例鼻咽癌调强放疗的临床研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(1):1-6. 被引量:154
  • 5胡丹,曹卡加,谢国丰,王成涛,张莹莹.鼻咽癌诱导化疗加放疗与同期放化疗疗效比较[J].中国肿瘤,2007,16(4):263-266. 被引量:9
  • 6Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Graf W, et al. Quality of life during chemotherapy in patients with symptomatic advanced colorectal cancer. The Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumor Adjuvant Therapy Group [J]. Cancer, 1994, 73(3) :556 -562.
  • 7Pazdur R, Vincent M. Raltitrexed (Tomudex) versus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5FU + LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) : resuhs of a randomized, multicenter, North American trial [ C]. Denver:Proc Am Soc, 1997 :a801.
  • 8Cocconi G, Cunningham D, Van Cutsem E, et al. Open, randomized, multicenter trial of raltitrexed versus fluorouracil plus high-dose leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Tomudex Colorectal Cancer Study Group [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16(9) : 2943 -2952.
  • 9Cunningham D, Zalcberg JR, Rath U, et al. Final results of a randomised trial comparing Tomudex ( raltitrexed ) with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. 'Tomudex' Colorectal Cancer Study Group [J]. Ann Oncol, 1996, 7(9) : 961 - 965.
  • 10Maughan T, James R, Kerr D, et al. Excess treatment related deaths and impaired quality of life show raltitrexed is inferior to infusional 5FU regimen in the palliative chemotherapy of advanced colorectal cancer ( CRC ) : final results of MRC CRO6 [J]. Ann Oncol, 2000, 11(Suppl4): a1850.

共引文献304

同被引文献58

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部