期刊文献+

多媒体学习的图文整合:空间邻近效应的元分析 被引量:5

Text-Picture Integration in Multimedia Learning:A Meta-Analysis of the Spatial Contiguity Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 多媒体学习中的空间邻近效应认为,当书页或屏幕上的对应的图像和文本邻近呈现时,要比图文远离呈现更加有利于学习者的学习。本元分析针对Ginns(2006)的不足,增加了近10年最新的研究,以保持测验、迁移测验和主观认知负荷作为结果变量,考察多媒体学习中空间邻近效应的稳定性,以及学习材料特征、学习及测验环境和学习者教育水平等的调节作用。经文献搜索与筛选,有53项研究符合元分析要求,在保持测验、迁移测验、主观认知负荷上分别生成了45个(2000人)、43个(1935人)、11个(645人)独立效应量。主效应检验发现:空间邻近组在保持测验(d_(保持)=0.48)和迁移测验(d_(迁移)=0.39)成绩上均显著高于空间远离组,在主观认知负荷上显著低于空间远离组(d认知负荷=-0.24)。调节效应检验发现:在高交互性材料(d_(高交互)=0.42)、系统步调(d_(系统步调)=0.52)、短时学习(d_(短时)=0.55)等条件下,空间邻近效应对学习的深层理解(迁移测验)能发挥更大的作用;对中小学生学习者(d中小学=0.71),空间邻近效应促进学习识记(保持测验)的效果更好;相对于电子环境,纸质学习环境下(d_(保持)=0.66,d_(迁移)=0.52)的空间邻近效应对保持和迁移测验的促进都更加显著;在主观认知负荷上,学习材料特征、学习及测验环境以及学习者教育水平对空间邻近效应均不存在调节作用。 The spatial contiguity effect shows that people learn more effectively when corresponding texts and pictures are presented close to each other rather than separately (Mayer, 2009). A meta-analysis based on 53 empirical studies was conducted to investigate the effects of spatial contiguity effect on subjective cognitive load, retention and transfer tests. Consistent with Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML) (Mayer, 2009) , the main effect analysis indicated that participants who learned from spatially contiguous materials outperformed those who were provided with spatially separated materials in both retention test (dretention = 0.48) and transfer test (d fer = 0.39). Besides, spatially contiguity reduced learners' subjective cognitive load (dcognitive load= -0. 24), which supported Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) (Sweller, 1994). The moderator analysis revealed that multimedia material characteristics (element interactivity, pacing of presentation, learning duration) affected the spatial contiguity effect on transfer test. Specifically, studies which used materials with high interactivity (dhigh interactivity 0.42), system-paced presentation (dsystem-presentation = 0.52), shorter duration ( dshorter duration = 0. 55 ) had larger effect size. Learning condition also had moderator effect on the spatial contiguity effect, learning with printed materials performed better both on retention and transfer tests (d retention = 0.66, d transfer= 0.52) than digital materials. In addition, the spatial contiguity may better enhance retention test when being applied to primary and secondary school students( dprimaryand daryschool = 0. 71 ). The subjective cognitive load reduces by spatial contiguity wasn't moderated by above factors. The results suggested that spatial contiguity effect could play an important role in text-picture integration of multimedia learning. Moreover, element interactivity, pacing of presentation, learning duration, learning condition and learners' educational level should be considered as vital moderators of spatial contiguity effect.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期565-578,共14页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(31300864) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(CCNU16A02023)资助
关键词 空间邻近效应 多媒体学习 图文整合 元分析 调节效应 spatial contiguity effect multimedia learning text-picture integration meta-analysis moderator effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献78

  • 1Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. ( 2012 ). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper.'? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5) , 1816 -1828.
  • 2Alexander, P. A. , & Jctton, T. L. (2003). Learning from traditional and alternative texts: New conceptualizations for the information age. In A. Graesser, M. Gernsbacher, & S. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 199 -241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 3Altan, T., & Cagihay, K. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of spatial contiguity effect in educational animations. In P. Z. & A. I. (Eds.), Learning and Collaboration Technologies (pp. 3 - 13). Los Angeles : Springer.
  • 4Ayres, P. , & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning ( ~oi. 2, pp. 135 - 146 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255 (5044), 556 -559. .
  • 6Bayram, S. , & Bayraktar, D. M. (2012). Using eye tracking to study on attention and recall in multimedia learning environments : The effects of design in learning. World Journal on Educational Technology, 4(2), 81 - 98.
  • 7Bobis, J. , Sweller, J. , & Cooper, M. (1993). Cognitive load effects in a primary-school geometry task. Learning and Instruction, 3 ( 1 ), 1 -21. .
  • 8Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Bruchmilller, K., & Hacker, S. (2005). Supporting learning with interactive multimedia through active integration of representations. Instructional Science, 33 ( 1 ), 73 - 95.
  • 9Bodemer, D. , Ploetzner, R. , Feuerlein, I. , & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning and Instruction, 14 ( 3 ), 325 - 341.
  • 10Borenstein, M. , Hedges, L. V. , Higgins, J. P. T. , & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

二级参考文献81

  • 1董奇.论元认知[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1989(1):68-74. 被引量:520
  • 2汪玲,郭德俊,方平.元认知要素的研究[J].心理发展与教育,2002,18(1):44-49. 被引量:73
  • 3陈英和,王雨晴,肖兴荣.3~5岁幼儿元认知监控发展特点的研究[J].心理与行为研究,2006,4(1):5-8. 被引量:13
  • 4朱熊兆,罗伏生,姚树桥,Randy P.Auerbach,JohnR.Z.Abela.认知情绪调节问卷中文版(CERQ-C)的信效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(2):121-124. 被引量:258
  • 5张晓东.词汇知识、短时记忆、工作记忆、元认知对外语听力的影响及作用机制.博士学位论文.北京师范大学.
  • 6Borkowski, J. G. (1996). Metacognition: theory or chapter heading? Learning and individual differences, 8(4), 391 - 402.
  • 7Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self- regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In: Weinert F. E. , Kluwe R. H. ed. Metacognition, motivation and understanding. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum, 65 -116.
  • 8Bryant, F. B. , & Guilbault, R. L. (2002). "I knew it all along" e- ventually: The development of hindsight bias in reaction to the Clin- ton impeachment verdict. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24 (1), 27 -41.
  • 9Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3. Journal of Learning Disa- bilities, 34,435 - 449.
  • 10Desoete, A., Roeyers, H. (2002). Off-line metacognition a domain- specific retardation in young children with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 25 (2) , 123 -139.

共引文献70

同被引文献27

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部